Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? A) Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly. B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle. C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed. D) The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray. E) Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones. Answer: C 我选B, 看了伤咖的文章可以了解B为什麽错.. 但是还是不能了解为什麽答案是C 是否可以请大家帮我解释一下! 谢谢! -- 音乐史, 我永远恨你.. (╯‵□′)╯︵ ┴─┴ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 68.122.146.33