作者chenemily (天天保持好心情)
看板GMAT
标题[问题] GWD 7-27
时间Wed Sep 23 08:15:01 2009
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have
to be reworked under the company’s warranty. The reworked jobs are
invariably satisfactory. When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it
is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a
level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited
more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs.
The argument above assumes which of the following?
A.There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of
mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs.
B.There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex
repair jobs.
C.Ace Repairs’ warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework
jobs.
D.Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on
complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked.
E.There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries
out first-time jobs satisfactorily.
答案A
请问一下 答案A取非是反驳it is not because the mechanics lack competence 这句吗
这题不是很懂他在表达什麽 有人可以解释一下吗
谢
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 71.100.137.109
1F:→ pentimento:这题原文认为「不是能力不足」而是「不专注」所以一次 09/23 08:59
2F:→ pentimento:修不好。但是A答案去掉 not 之後,成为「两次修理的人 09/23 09:00
3F:→ pentimento:不同」,因而成为「另有他因」的反驳。加回not 09/23 09:00
4F:→ pentimento:之後,就成为「他因反驳的反驳」,而为假设。 09/23 09:01
5F:→ chenemily:谢 09/23 09:17