目前假设题的作法我都是有not取掉not, 或没not补上not来当反驳题作. 可是今天做PP2时做到此题. 此题看别人的解法算是"搭桥". 但我ㄧ开始当反驳题做确非常的绕(即取非) ~ 花了很多时间 所以请问ㄧ下各位神人, 当您们看到假设题时. 您们的作法是 (1) 全部先取非当反驳题做. 有些虽然绕但还是解的出来 (2) 全部先取非, 等无法顺利解时在从正面思考下手 (3) 读完题目都就知道是用搭桥方式解或是当反驳 我现在是无法用(3)方法, 头脑没这麽灵活在短时间判断出来. 现在全部的假设题都当反驳先做.可今天此题就踢了铁板 ~ 还是这题当反驳也是可以很快? 谢谢 ~ 注: "搭桥"就"类似" 题目A-B, B-C, 然後答案找连结. A recent report determined that although only three percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, thirty-three percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not. The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions? (A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are less likely to be ticketed for exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who do not. (B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed. (C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit was greater than the number of vehicles that were equipped with radar detectors. (D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report. (E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the speed limit more often than did drivers on other state highways not covered in the report. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.68.73.29