这题是PP3 SC1 第255题 (25857-!-item-!-188;#058&001732) 答案E 前面有版友回答过了 小弟不才再补充一下 ※ 引述《giyoshi (oh no 逆误会了)》之铭言： : 这题好像极具争议...我看CD的讨论有十页之多... : 而且~不是二选一在争论, : 很多答案都有人支持. 想听听大家想法... : Q19: : (全题都划线) : Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, : especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely : to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when : they do appear. : 1. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, : especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely : to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when : they do appear. 第一 it指代不清 因为it不得指代an executive 如果回头指代heavy commitment 语意逻辑也不通 Heavy commitment makes it likely to miss signs... commitment不会miss东西 第二 插入语 , especially if it has worked well in the past, 这边有很大的问题 因为他是在action(n.)的同位语或是修饰语的位置上 用if条件子句(副词子句)来修饰他并不适当 : 2. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, : especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs : of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear. 第一 句意改变 主要的焦点从commitment变成 an executive 第二 修饰语likely调位 这种写法很奇怪 第三 makes missing signs 不对 第四 one that worked well 表达的是「过去曾经对」 但是在这句当中 现在完成式的 one that has worked well (迄今都对) 会比过去简单式表达贴切 第五 well没有redundant的问题 因为每个选项都有 : 3. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action : is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when : they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past. 第一 同样句意改变 第二 especially if it has worked...这句有两个问题 (1) 跳跃修饰action 隔了太远 (2) 同答案A里面提到的 就算有修饰到action 也不该是if子句 : 4. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, : especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely : to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when : they do appear. 第一 them没有东西可以指代 executives所有格化了 第二 sb.'s being Vpp是不佳的写法 第三 同样if子句作修饰语的问题 第四 to V and Ving平行 : 5. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one : that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive : miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they : do appear. Being开头 可能会一开始就被删掉了吧XD 讲正确的理由 第一 这边是动名词(Ving)片语作名词使用 整个Being heavily committed to a course of action 视为一个「名词」 这个「名词」使得整个句子变成 Something makes an executive miss signs... 第二 这边是one that has worked well in the past作 a course of action的修饰语 没有if子句作修饰语的问题 而且紧接在action後面作修饰也是符合避免跳跃修饰的原则 : 我是选A啦~但是....我其实也不知道他错在哪.... 这题算是很难的题目了... 这边分享一点小心得 看到长句里面一定要注意修饰语/同位语的写法 特别是 N, ~~~, V 这种的写法 通常这边都会有考点 这题如果有知道这件事 就可以比对出来one跟if的差别 知道不该用if 就可以先删ACD 然後B的修饰语时态没有比E好 make missing跟likely也都不对 就选E了 现在的考题都偏向修饰语跟逻辑句意 长句用这种方式解题 虽然可能会花一点时间 但是正确率会提高 删being这种技巧除非是真的太明显的错 不然还是少用比较好 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.216.2.127 ※ 编辑: IamNoTaStaR 来自: 61.216.2.127 (09/10 23:41) ※ 编辑: IamNoTaStaR 来自: 61.216.2.127 (09/10 23:44)