※ 引述《justinkay (梦想～～)》之铭言： : One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other : copanies. This technique commanly called "benchmarking," permits the manager : of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a : justification for the adoption of good practices. : Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the : performance of a company against companies with which it is not in : competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: : (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that : the manager making the comparisons already employs. : (B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitiors : is particularly difficult. : (C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have : comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is : likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. : (D) Managers are generally more respective to new ideas that they fiund : outside their own industry. : (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of : practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products : or markets. : Ans:E : 请大大可以帮忙解释一下 为什麽答案昰E,A不可以? : 谢谢!! 一个经理人要怎麽合理化他是从与非竞争者的比较中学到对方的better practice 而非与竞争者的比较 A 与竞争者比较大多只会focus在这个经理早就用过的招数--因为彼此是竞争者 英雄所见略同吧 B 要学到竞争者绝招的密奥特别不容易 C 竞争者彼此应该都有差不多的效率--此处是假设完全竞争吧--只有与非竞争者学习 才能赢竞争者 D 经理人大多对产业外的点子比较重视(respectful?) E 大多好公司的成功都导因於他们能成功利用他们产品与市场的特殊环境--如此一来那跟 竞争者与非竞争者比不都一样 以上浅见 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.66.245.2