One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other copanies. This technique commanly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices. Any of the following, if true, is a vaild reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT: (A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs. (B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitiors is particularly difficult. (C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors. (D) Managers are generally more respective to new ideas that they fiund outside their own industry. (E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets. Ans:E 请大大可以帮忙解释一下 为什麽答案昰E,A不可以? 谢谢!! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.192.49.169