※ 引述《denizee3 (妮 快疯了!!!)》之铭言： : Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the : same number of hours per week.According to records maintained by each company, : the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than : did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are : less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P. : Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above? : (A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related : accidents than did the employees of Company O. : (B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than : did Company O. : (C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees : of Company O. : (D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident. : (E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single : machine. : 答案是B, 我选C : 我看後面B选项的解释 我还是搞不懂为什麽答案是B OG上对B选项的解释是overstate the number of job-related accidents 可以看出company P在accident types上认定过多不该认定的，所以overstate 事实上P的数量应该更低，搞不好比Q还低，所以weaken : 当初会选C是因为觉得反正都常常生病不在公司了当然意外发生的频率相对会减少 : 看到後面的C选项解释是可以免强接受 : 想要请问各位贤人是否有更好的解释? : 谢谢! <(__ __)> 而C选项，题目是在讨论number of job-related accidents， C选项讨论的sick跟这并没有关系，若硬去解释， 会犯了"过度推论"和"过於武断"的错误，这在cr的错误选项常常可以看到。 希望对你有帮助 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.78.34