作者pringless (pringles~*)
看板GMAT
标题[问题] PP1 CR#8
时间Mon Jan 5 10:52:41 2009
The Highway Traffic Safety Institute reports that the PZ 1000 has the fewest
injuries per accident of any car in its class. This shows that the PZ 1000
is one of the safest cars available today.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the
advertisement?
(A) The Highway Traffic Safety Institute report listed many cars in other
classes that had more injuries per accident than did the PZ 1000.
请问一下这题A为甚麽不能选？？
我的想法是 这题犯类比错,某个等级里最安全不代表现今所有车里面最安全
所以A不就是说其他等级的车在每次accident的伤害比PZ1000多吗？？
那为什麽不对？还是我的翻译就错了...
谢谢^^
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.39.94
※ 编辑: pringless 来自: 118.168.34.66 (01/05 10:54)
※ 编辑: pringless 来自: 118.168.34.66 (01/05 11:13)
1F：推 StephenWan:(A)补充了其他class的车都更容易发生意外所以支持?? 01/05 12:00
2F：推 poison999:所以A support not weaken? 01/05 12:30
3F：推 AKgOd:我觉得A应该是无关选项 题目说在PZ1000的class中~ 01/05 19:49
4F：→ AKgOd:A说 other class的车~ 01/05 19:49
5F：推 StephenWan:可是结论是说PZ1000是最安全的车之一(所有class)，而A 01/05 20:01
6F：→ StephenWan:的答案刚好补充了原来题目中只有提到同款车是最安全的 01/05 20:02
7F：→ StephenWan:所以我才想说应该是支持，大家在讨论看看搂^^ 01/05 20:03
8F：推 iammarsman:个人觉得many改成all才支持欧 01/07 00:00
9F：推 iammarsman:many是个笼统的字,比例多或少有可能形成支持或反驳 01/07 00:02