※ 引述《shyuan (好奇怪喔)》之铭言： : Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job : applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the : applicant would suffer a heart attack. The presiding judge justified the : ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers. : The use of this court ruling as part of the law could not be effective in : regulating employment practices if which of the following were true? : (A) The best interests of employers often conflict with the interests of : employees. : (B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job : applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any : particular occupation. : (C) Some jobs might involve health risks other than the risk of heart attack. : (D) Employees who have a 90 percent chance of suffering a heart attack may be : unaware that their risk is so great. : (E) The number of people applying for jobs at a company might decline if the : company, by screening applicants for risk of heart attack, seemed to : suggest that the job entailed high risk of heart attack. : ans B : 看不太懂这题的意思 : 想顺便请教看不懂题目时 这题选项要如何排除呢 : 谢谢大家~~~~ 题目是说假如新进来的员工,可能因为从事这个工作而有90%的机会会得到心脏病 那麽公司可以拒绝录用,这个做法可以保护雇主跟员工. (B)则说 百分之几(因为工作而得到心脏病)的计算是没有合法的计算方式的 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.166.11.209