作者ayupan (哈哈~~)
看板GMAT
标题[问题] PP1-CR-10
时间Sat Dec 20 23:13:18 2008
10.
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000
fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline
in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February
1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental
outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also
sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the
decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold
only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force
of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
(A) In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
(B) In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened
in Centerville.
(C) Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a
discount on certain nights of the week.
(D) People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in
a theater.
(E) People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
答案是E
想请教一下这题答案A为何不可??
是因为跟videorama就会被视为support吗?
谢谢!!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.235.43
1F：推 Vinicks:(A)没有反驳力道喔 他是在4000这个基础上加强J的反驳 12/21 00:33
2F：→ Vinicks:但他却没有反驳到B的理论喔 记住题干就好 反驳B的理论 12/21 00:34
3F：→ Vinicks:他等於是说4000是一部分 还有比4000更多的出租影响了J 12/21 00:35
4F：→ Vinicks:要反驳B就是提出证明 借出的这四千效力大於一万 答案(E) 12/21 00:50
5F：→ ayupan:了了~~谢谢(哈...两组相同的字...) 12/21 02:11