※ 引述《alima (贾考柏)》之铭言： : Press Secretary: : Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations : demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts : controlled by opposition parties. : They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects : canceled were in such districts. : But all of the canceled projects had been identified : as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. : So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, : not partisan politics. : Which of the following is an assumption : on which the press secretary’s argument depends? 提供一下我的想法, 有错请指正:) 题目的逻辑论述是: 因为被取消的project 所以总统做的决定是基於 都经由中立方确认为浪费 ---> 预算而不是政党偏见 : 1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way : for the President to punish legislative districts : controlled by opposition parties. 取消project不是唯一用来....的方法, 看到only就不太想选了, 明显错, 无关选项. : 2. The scheduled highway projects identified : as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects : in districts controlled by the President’s party. 被确认为浪费的project, 大部分不在总统党管辖区, 大方向一致, 先保留. : 3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion : of all the highway projects : that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. in the near future错, 时间焦点不对. : 4. The highway projects canceled in districts : controlled by the President’s party : were not generally more expensive : than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. 总统党管辖区被取消的project没有比较贵, 错误比较+无关资讯(cost) : 5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded : by the opposition parties as a source of objective : assessments of government projects 中立方的报告一般不被反对党当做客观的评估. 这感觉weaken了原题的论述. 如果不看中立方的资讯, 如何推出总统决策是基於预算考量而非政党偏见呢? 大方向错. 结论只好回去选B了 有错请指教^^ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.40.194