※ 引述《over1221 (照着感觉走)》之铭言： : 之前有大牛提供了一个方法 : 方法一 : 结论有新观念 找有not的选项 : 结论没有新观念 去找新观念 : 最近在写assumption的题目 我发现这个方法多少有帮助 : 手足无措的时候可以用 : 方法二 : 在选项前加not 看可不可以反驳结论 : 方法三 : 最後是老方说得 assumption像是一个桥 他要连接前提和结论 : 如果两方有一方不是桥的两边 必错 我用这个方式可以删去一些无关选项, 很快 比方说有提到文中没有出现过的新元素....这选项就优先删除 但有时候题目後面会加一些奇怪的意见......比方 Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics. Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends? 题目是问说 抱怨总统取消高速公路的提案 是为了惩罚反对党 证据是 90%被取消的提案都落在这个区间里 但我看不懂的是後来的But, 他说这些废案都被无党籍的人认为是浪费 所以总统的选择出发点并非党派影响？ 1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. 2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party. 3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future. 4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. 5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects 如题, 请问此题怎麽切入会比较好 ? --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.240.83.123