作者Vinicks (信将)
看板GMAT
标题[语文]GWD 32-Q1 CR
时间Sat Dec 6 01:46:07 2008
Q3: GWD32-Q1
The cause of the wreck of the ship Edmund Fitzgeraid in a severe storm on
lake Superior is still unknown , when the sunken wreckage of the vessel was
found, searchers discovered the hull in two pieces lying close together, The
storm’s violent waves would have caused separate pieces floating even
briefly on the surface to drift apart. Therefore, the breakup of the null can
be ruled out as the cause of the sinking.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A.Ships as large as the Edmund Fitzgerald rarely sink except in the most
violent weather.
B.Under water currents at the time of the storm did not move the separated
pieces of the hull together again.
C.Pieces of the hull would have sunk more quickly than the intact hull would
have
D.The waves of the storm were not violent enough to have caused the breakup
E.If the ship broke up before sinking , the pieces of the hull would not
have remained on the surface for very long
AND:(B) 我这题写对 但是 我是删掉了其他四个 才选(B)的 因此不清楚他们的逻辑关系
请大大们指教
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.127.197.112
1F:推 freemind99:题目原意是发现两块靠在一起的船壳 但照理说暴风雨 12/06 09:10
2F:→ freemind99:来时的海浪应该足以将两者分开才是 12/06 09:11
3F:→ freemind99:因此推论船壳的分裂将排除是因为下沉的关系 12/06 09:12
4F:→ freemind99:所以焦点摆在wave(因)和hull(果)上 12/06 09:13
5F:→ freemind99:b排除了造成hull靠在一起是海浪造成的原因 12/06 09:15
6F:→ Vinicks:谢谢^^ 12/06 21:27