作者filley (我要改变...)
看板GMAT
标题[语文] pp2-cr-58
时间Mon Dec 1 21:58:45 2008
58. (33711-!-item-!-188;#058&007588)
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish.
There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not
the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the
increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually
generate.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion
drawn above?
(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city's police force does not
necessarily reduce crime.
(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year,
there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
(C) If funding for the new police officers' salaries is approved, support for
other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and
not all convictions result in prison terms.
(E) Middletown's ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at
which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on
crime.
Ans: E
我想问D为什麽不能当答案呢??
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.193.145.194
1F:推 Vinicks:(D)irrelevant 举例其他大多数的美国城市并无法进一步说明 12/01 22:06
2F:→ Vinicks:Middletown的情况 例:台湾"大多数人"都很有钱 能说全台湾 12/01 22:07
3F:→ Vinicks:人都很钱吗?? 当然不行噜 像我就很穷= = 12/01 22:07