作者faultfinder (faultfinder)
看板GMAT
标题Re: [语文] PP1-SC-5
时间Wed Sep 26 06:12:35 2007
※ 引述《SABC (SABC)》之铭言:
: 标题: Re: [语文] PP1-SC-5
: 时间: Wed Sep 26 01:46:07 2007
:
: ※ 引述《faultfinder (faultfinder)》之铭言:
: : 回KMI :
: : 5. The Achaemenid empire of Persia reached the Indus Valley in the fifth
: : century B.C., bringing (the Aramaic script with it, from which was derived
: : both northern and) southern India alphabets.
: : A. the Aramaic script with it, from which was derived both northern and
: : (was 单数动词与 both .. and …alphabets多数主词,主词动词数的不一致)删除
: : B. the Aramaic script with it, and from which deriving both the northern and
: : the
: : (which子句应该有动词,但deriving是分词,不是动词) )删除
: : C. with it the Aramaic script, from which derive both the northern and the
: : D. with it the Aramaic script, from which derives both northern and
: : (同A:derives单数动词与 both .. and …alphabets多数主词,主词动词数的不一致) )
: : 删除
: : E. with it the Aramaic script, and deriving from it both the northern and
: : (把没画线的bringing一起读 => bringing with it the Aramaic script, and
: : deriving from it both the northern and southern India alphabets.
: : 两个分词片语的平行结构只需要用and连接,不需在and前给逗号。
: : 就是说:Ving and Ving 才对,Ving , and Ving 不对)删除
: : (三个以上才要逗号,就是说:Ving ,Ving , and Ving)
:
: 不好意思,补充一下个人看法^^",
: 我个人觉得如果只遵循「若仅两样并列,则and前不需要有逗点」规则。不一定可靠。
: 避竟有时候长句,或是含两个不同分辞修饰的句子也可能出现and前逗号合理的情况,
:
: E要找错误,直接从1.)both後的the nothern and __southern缺the没对称,
: 或是2.)从文意看,主词the Achaemenid empire会deriving出啥东西?说不通得之。
:
:
: : P.S.
: : 老方也知道with it (两个字)必须放在the Aramaic script(三个字)之前以免头重脚轻,
: : 就如同答案C 里的from which derive(动词一个字) both the northern and the
: : southern India alphabets (主词八个字)一样也是主词与动词的位置对调,以免头重脚
: : 轻。不过,这些倒装句型都是在用简单规则找出答案之後再补充的。他认为:这些规则不
: : 是很重要,因为OG例题及上千考古题几乎都不需要用这规则就通通可解出正确答案。总之
: : ,教英文文法规则的老师,教了几十年,大概对英文文法规则的知识都差不多,只是常考
: : 的是哪些,就有赖老师去归纳了,我们补习的不就是需要这些嘛!?
:
: --
:
: --
:
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 122.121.37.175
: ※ 编辑: SABC 来自: 122.121.37.175 (09/26 01:47)
SABC,你好!在某些情况允许两个单元的平行结构可以用 X, and Y,当然是可以,如
In January 1994 an oil barge ran aground off the coast of San Juan, Puerto
Rico, and its cargo of 750,000gallons leaked into the ocean, polluting the
city’s beaches.(引自GWD题)。我只是回应zhin大的问题:方老师的神奇解题,不是要
讨论全部的错误。这一题的Ving, and Ving肯定错。其他的错:deriving的意思在此题不
合逻辑、後面少一个the,谢谢提供。敬请谅解!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.250.111.105
1F:推 SABC:^^"讨论越多进步越快~ 09/26 20:33