作者kohi120 (不喝咖啡)
看板GEPT
标题Re: [心得] 2012.9/8高级小小心得
时间Sat Sep 15 02:27:04 2012
基於方便直接原文引用,不好意思
※ 引述《ginisisi (gini)》之铭言:
: ==============================切入正题之听力部份============================
: Short conversation
1. From the interview, what can we know about Ellen?
a) she is going to hire some people
b) she has time for vacation
c) she runs two different busineess
d) ...schedule (这选项记不太清楚)
->这题好像是C吧
2. Who encourages her to run the literary camp?
我是写书店小孩,不确定对错。
->对,书店里的小孩
3. What activities do they do in the camp?
我写archery和role play.似乎还有其他?
->活动好像分两题,一题问一般性活动,好像是基於某本书?
->一题问还有其他特别吸引人的活动,那一题好像才是role play?
4. What can we know about this year's registration?
如g大提到的,应该是fully booked.
->没错
->书店阅读还有一题问说,厂商帮了什麽忙
->答案应该是赞助贫苦青年报名费
: 2.这题考学生和教授的对话
我的理解是:学生疑惑说为何science revolution很早就有了
但为何chemistry的发展却是到17世纪才开始?
教授说是受到alchemy的影响.
1. What's the student's question?
我写如上说的:为何chemistry的发展却是到17世纪才开始?
->不记得17世纪,也可以写why....delayed?
2. What did the alchemists use to turn into 忘记是啥了?
没听清,只听到有mercury...XD
根据autoigni大补:mercury的另一个答案好像是lead...?
->偷懒写base materials
3. What makes people believe that they can transform the materials?
我写因为人们认为可以turn grapes into wine等
->或者materials are transformable?
4. 好像是alchemist在发展上帮了什麽忙?
autoigni:应该是有助於现代实验室的开展
->好像是促进实验技巧的发展,原文不记得了?
->还有5. 两位化学家的贡献,答案好像是促进炼金术跟化学的区隔(乱猜)。
: Long talk
: 1.澳洲的沙尘暴
这部分我觉得我一直听不到它的重点Orz,都乱写就不分享答案了。
1. What's true about the dust storm on Sep 23?
详细选项不记得了,我和g大一样写破纪录.
->这题应该是问what is NOT true,答案我猜"风暴只会波於XX地区"?
2. Why people are told to stay home on Sep 23?
->会影响健康,特别是对呼吸道和XX有问题者
3. What area of Sydney does the dust storm benefit? (大概是吧)
->好像是港区?
4. What are the effects on the soil? (记得不太完整)
autoigni: 澳洲沙尘暴那题重点应该是沙尘吹走表土(topsoil)
使得下方矿物质(mineral)露出 有助於农业
->我听成携带大量有益矿物质
5. 不确定,好像是effects on the ocean?
应该是g大说的温室效应那题.
->我乱写global warming
: TV critics的甘苦谈
1.如 G大提到的,为何这speaker要来讲这些?
我也是选warn those who want to be TV critics
->我猜演讲给年轻学生那个选项。
2. What has lacking of time prevent TV critics from doing?
是没办法看所有TV shows吗? 不确定.
->应该没错
3. What are the two features of recent TV shows?
一个应该是immitation, 一个是original but lack of humor (这字没听清不确定)
->听漏了orz....
4. What does the speaker think of Happy Valley and 另一个TV show?
A) they shouldn't have been made
B) she enjoys them
C) 不记得
D) she regrets not seeing them earlier.
没听清乱选A
->这题应该选"还好有持续多看几集(因为刚开始不吸引人)"
5. Why TV critics break their hearts?
不确定, 好像是好的shows die too soon?
->应该没错,但原因可能要补上,是因为low ratings?
->还有一题应该是问:对Tv critic职业的误解
->答案我不确定,乱猜乱写说"以为可以当couch potato"
: ===================================阅读部份=============================
: R1
: 第一篇在讲MMR(measle,mump and rubella)
: 还有医界人士如何改良、并且使民众接种疫苗
1. 不太确定问题,大概是关於某医生.
我选patriotism
->没错
->2.应该是问说某医师的研究反应什麽样的矛盾情结
答案应该是明明疫苗注射有那麽多验证,却还是担心打了出事
2. 把一个句子插入文章中所标XYZ其中一个位置。
句子大意是说如果孩子挂了家长会不好受, 所以我放emotions play那段.
->後面的段落好像是"只要注射後真的出了事,一辈子都不会原谅自己"
3. 某医生如何成功推广(?)smallpox?
我写他透过用cowpox
->应该是,对人体无害的cowpox
4. From the last paragraph what does the writer imply?
我写人们还是不完全相信疫苗
->没错吧
: 第二篇在讲艺术的翻修
主要是讲壁画的修复
1. Why is the restoration of 某壁画 controversial?
我写workers认为有些shadowy details是後来的画家加上的,应该一并清除
但critics认为也是Michelangelo画的
->应该是
2. How do the workers preserve sfumato on the painting?
应该是保留光亮漆的最後一层
->应该是
3. Why are critics happy about recent restoration?
我想应该是原文说guarded approach那段吧
->因为造成之後的修复都很保守
->好像还有一题选择,答案好像是修复造成过度修饰
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.163.199.77
※ 编辑: kohi120 来自: 118.163.199.77 (09/15 02:33)
※ 编辑: kohi120 来自: 118.163.199.77 (09/15 02:34)
※ 编辑: kohi120 来自: 118.163.199.77 (09/15 02:35)
1F:推 raincrain:对Tv critic职业的误解,似乎是每个人都可以当TV critic? 09/16 22:00
2F:→ fineting:看起来高级考的好难啊!我觉得中高就很吃力了! 10/24 18:56