今天是季後赛开打的第一天，凌晨看了公牛跟超赛的对决，只能说季後赛的张力十足， 比常规赛更加刺激。当季後赛进行的如火如荼，放假的勇士则要摩拳擦掌，精挑细选。 Final Lottery Standings and Chances to win #1 Pick. 1. Kings (16-64) -- 25 percent chance to win 2t. Wizards (19-61) -- 19.9 percent 2t.. Clippers (19-61) -- 15.6 percent 4. Thunder (22-58) -- 11.9 percent 5. Grizzlies (23-57) -- 8.8 percent 6. Timberwolves (24-56) -- 6.3 percent 7. Warriors (29-51) -- 4.3 percent ← 今年选秀顺位落在这 8. Knickerbockers (31-50) -- 2.8 percent 9. Raptors (31-49) -- 1.7 percent 10t. Nets/Bucks (33-47) -- 1.1 percent/.8 percent 是的，勇士是今年的第七顺位，有4.3%的机会选到状元。 Our Percentages at winning the #2 or the #3 pick with a 7th placed lottery finish: 2nd Pick: 4.9% ← 在第7顺位的位置下，抽中探花的机率 4.9% 3rd Pick: 5.8% ← 在第7顺位的位置下，抽中榜眼的机率 5.8% 2009~10年球季预计的阵容如下： PG: None (Crawford/Watson) SG: Monta Ellis SF: Stephen Jackson PF: Anthony Randolph C: Andris Biedrins 6th Man: Corey Maggette 问题来了，勇士要选择哪个位子的球员呢？ 问题来了，勇士要选择哪个位子的球员呢？ 问题来了，勇士要选择哪个位子的球员呢？ Why the Warriors should draft a PG ? 为什麽要选择控球後卫？ If there's a position we are thin at it will be at the PG position. We are lacking Pass First or Court Vision while we have a more than adequate amount of scoring PG's. Our PG's: Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Crawford 如果真要去想说哪号位的球员最薄弱，那我会选择一号位这个位子。 我们缺乏以传球为优先或是全场视野良好的後卫，相对之下，我们反而有太多得分型的 控球後卫。 我们的PG:Ellis, Morrow, Watson, Crawford。 Why the Warriors should draft a SG or SF ? 为什麽要选择得分後卫、小前锋？ My personal opinion is that we are OK at these positions especially at the 2, but we need a 2 or 3 who can defend man to man and possibly shoot the long ball. We can also go 2 or 3 if management's draft strategy is to go BPA (Best Player Available). Our 2's: Ellis, Morrow, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike Our 3's: Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike, Randolph [Possible 我认为我们在2、3号位上的球员是OK的，特别是2号位，但我们需要能在2、3号位上提供 防守的球员，并要有长射能力。当然我们也可以去选2、3号球员，如果勇士决策阶层的 选秀策略是朝着BPA前进的话。(意指假设在选秀会中其他位子的人才都不出色，那就选 个最厉害2、3号位球员吧，类似台语的:没鱼，虾也好。) 我们的2号位球员:Ellis, Morrow, Crawford, Belinelli, Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike 我们的3号位球员:Jackson, Maggette, Azubuike, Randolph [Possible] Why the Warriors should draft a PF ? 为什麽要选择大前锋？ I also personally think we are fit in the future at PF, a combo of Wright and Randolph may set us for years IF we keep them. Regardless, if we win the lotto for the #1 we pick Griffin if we lose and go BPA we may pick another PF (Which I doubt). Our 4's: Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf, (All 3's if we play small) 个人觉得目前在4号位的球员都很合适，有着Wright以及Randolph在四号位的一前一後， 假设这两位我们都能留住的话，他们可以替我们撑个几年。不管怎样，假如我们赢得了 状元签，我们偷笑挑走Griffin；如果没有状元签，那就朝着BPA的模式下挑一个比较好的 大前锋吧。(我怀疑还有谁可以挑) 我们的4号位球员:Randolph, Kurz, Davidson, Wright, Turiaf,(如果打小阵容就换3号) Why the Warriors should draft a C ? 为什麽要选择中锋？ The Warriors should draft a Center, but not as a starter, but a backup. This years draft is incredibly weak at the Center spot with only 2 1st round talents in Thabeet and Mullens. You do not draft a backup at #7, but once again if we go BPA and Thabeet is available at our slot not at #1 then he may be the pick. Our 5's: Biedrins, Turiaf, Randolph, (All 4's if we play small) 勇士应该要挑一个中锋，但是用来当替补的。今年除了第一轮的Thabeet以及Mullens， 其他中锋弱到一个令人不敢置信的地步。当然你不会用第七顺位去选一个替补，可是在 BPA的模式下那就该选择Thabeet。 我们的5号位球员:Biedrins, Turiaf, Randolph, (打小阵容换4号) Why the Warriors should Trade The Pick ? 为什麽要交易掉选秀权？ The Warriors should trade down if at our slot there is no perfect candidate to pick with (Mainly a non-top 3 pick). A trade down to the mid-later 1st would give us many specialists to pick and some pre-season high rated prospects such as Mullens, Teague, Aminu, Lawson, Collison. We can also trade for current NBA players who management target. 假设今年名单上都没有可以选的人才(如果没有前三顺位)，那勇士就该交易掉选秀权。 交易掉首轮中段的选秀权可以给我们的专家去挑选一些前一季的高顺位的新秀，像是 Mullens, Teague, Aminu, Lawson, Collison 或是决策阶层也可以用首轮选秀权去换 当今的NBA球员。 (文章取自: http://0rz.tw/9XHZr ) -- 能推闪光，谁要推王? 能当禽兽，谁玩魔兽! ─所以我一直迟迟无法脱离WOW --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.35.34