: 前文恕删 : 首先我想强调 : 一直讨论基金有没有复利这个问题 感觉上似乎没有很大的意义 : 反正能赚钱就是好的投资 : 我也不是想追根究底.咬文嚼字 或跟版众做无谓的争执 : 只是对基金公司与理财书强打 "投资基金 达到复利的效果" 感到反感与疑惑 : 用这种质疑与困惑的心态来讨论 希望大家不要伤和气才好 ^^ : 毕竟每次看到以下说法: : 爱因斯坦︰「复利是世界上最可怕的力量」 (复利不可怕 不懂复利才令人害怕) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : 复利比原子弹还可怕 (这怎麽比??) : 定期定额投资基金最能发挥时间的复利效果 (甚至连定期定额都跟复利有关了??) http://0rz.tw/a53e8 Einstein, compound interest: Does not compute I wrote to the Albert Einstein Institute, to the American Institute of Physics, and to other places where people might know obscure sources of Einstein’s sayings and writings, to try to verify the quote. It surely did not turn up in Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations, nor in the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. Those specialists in Einstein data and history could not verify the quote (which is the careful way of phrasing it). One fellow I spoke with said if he had a nickel for every time he was asked to verify the compound interest quote, he would have no need for compound interest. I can say with confidence that Albert Einstein never wrote or said anything about compound interest. While Einstein wrote about a wide variety of topics, compound interest is not among them. 那句话是否由爱因斯坦说出？争议点在： markharrison Says: （其中一个回应者） September 28th, 2007 at 4:31 am Hi, I had to investigate the same “Did Einstein say that?” question for a piece on my blog. As far as I could tell, the phrase was first used in a 1983 article in the New York Times. 而爱因斯坦生於1879年，卒於1955年 --这话怎麽如此晚出现？令人费解-- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 124.8.12.4