※ [本文转录自 HatePolitics 看板 #1JDlNZON ] 作者: mornlunar (Hav-A-Tampa) 看板: HatePolitics 标题: [黑特] 凌晨的成人童话时间 时间: Sun Mar 30 00:33:35 2014 今天的凌晨成人童话时间，我们请来洋天朝驻台总督府，喔不，说错了，是美国在台协会 理事之一的David Brown先生为我们讲几句话XD http://tinyurl.com/locbbpk 注意！该连结文中不同颜色的字体为评论、很明显超级偏颇 You and others will note that it omits much of the story concerning the STA, which the DPP has opposed from its signing last June. She conveniently omits the DPP's record of obstruction of LY consideration of the agreement. That began in the special LY session last fall and continued with dilatory handling of forums on the agreement. 民进党的说法「略去了有关服贸争议的大部份事实，就是民进党从去年6月起即反对签署，并 阻挠立法院审议此一协议」；去年秋天开始的立院特别会期，民进党「持续干扰有关此一 协议之讨论」；到3月17日的前一星期，民进党一再阻止服贸协议进入立院委员会的审议 ，这应该就是何以国民党强力在3月18日把协议由委员会进入院会讨论。 But if its about democracy, is the DPP's repeated physical blocking of LY action democratic? 但是，如果事关民主，难道民进党反覆封锁议场的行为就可以被称为民主嘛？ 编按：这句话杀伤力最重XD The DPP's problem is that the KMT, divided as it is, has a LY majority, and the DPP will go to whatever lengths are necessary to block the majority when their key interests are involved or when it suits the DPP's election mobilization goals to exploit issues for political advantage. 民进党的问题在於自己是立法院的少数党，所以只要涉及关键利益，或符合选举动员的目 标，民进党会用尽一切方法阻止国民党，「利用这些议题以获取政治利益」。 编按：美国老爸果然局外人看的比较透彻XD Taiwan is a democracy in transition. It faces challenges and some of those challenges come from the DPP. 台湾民主正在转型，面临一些挑战，「有些挑战是来自民进党」。 -- 洋天朝下重手了，猴群果然不出所料的找BKS去解释，可惜人家就在H饭店观察， 草山上面的CIA我看也没闲着，你看洋天朝驻台总督府副钦差直接写文打BKS的 脸，BKS你现在感觉如何阿？(σﾟOﾟ)σﾟOﾟ)σﾟOﾟ)σ -- ◥ ◣ ◢●◢ ◣ _ ◢ ▂▄▅▆▇ ▇▆▅▄▃▁〝 ) ◤ ( \ ◤ ▁ ︰ ▅ ◥ ◥ ◤ / c _◤ ''' = ◣ ╱ f ▆▃ '' ▉◥ ◣ i ◣ ˍ▁▂▃▄▄▄▄▃▂▁ˍ ◢◢◣ ,◢ ◥= --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 42.77.88.144 ※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/HatePolitics/M.1396110819.A.617.html 我说清楚点好了，本文连结中的The View from Taiwan不是AIT官方或是NELSON REPORT 该文章是由MT(我不清楚煞谁或是他的背景)做出评论，真正原文在此 Thanks for sharing Bi-Khim's open letter. She deserves respect, but this piece is a partisan statement of DPP views on the current crisis in the LY. That's her job, of course. You and others will note that it omits much of the story concerning the STA, which the DPP has opposed from its signing last June. She conveniently omits the DPP's record of obstruction of LY consideration of the agreement. That began in the special LY session last fall and continued with dilatory handling of forums on the agreement. The week before March 17, the DPP had repeatedly prevented the planned article by article review of the STA at the LY committee level. That obstructionism was the proximate incentive for the KMT to ram through a decision moving the STA from committee to plenary consideration on Mar. 18. It is remarkable that the students reacted so quickly that same evening to occupy the LY. The KMT has accused the DPP of instigating this action, an accusation that many believe. Unnamed DPP politicians were reportedly on the scene later that evening; and the party endorsed the action the following day, and then encouraged all its members to support the students' illegal occupation. A DPP poll published a few days earlier had indicated that a plurality of DPP members (40%) were dissatisfied with the party's knee-jerky opposition to every step forward in cross-strait relations. So rather than have the DPP LY caucus responsible for continuing to block consideration of the STA, wasn't it in the DPP's interest to have students play that role? Bi-Khim portrays this as a struggle for democracy. It's really another fundamental clash of approaches toward the mainland and toward Taiwan's future. But if its about democracy, is the DPP's repeated physical blocking of LY action democratic? The DPP's problem is that the KMT, divided as it is, has a LY majority, and the DPP will go to whatever lengths are necessary to block the majority when their key interests are involved or when it suits the DPP's election mobilization goals to exploit issues for political advantage. I suspect that the fall election is a key consideration in how the party is handling the issue. In this country we would not permit such obstruction to occur in the Congress, and we would not view the DPP's obstruction tactics as legitimate democratic action. Taiwan is a democracy in transition. It faces challenges and some of those challenges come from the DPP. ※ 编辑: mornlunar 来自: 42.77.88.144 (03/30 01:06) ※ bukkake0103:转录至看板 FuMouDiscuss 03/30 04:56

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ※ 转录者: ubs2000110 (219.85.178.68), 03/30/2014 05:40:01