※ 引述《redbeam (溺毙的海绵)》之铭言： : please help me : Aestheticism and Diabolism : 讲的主义是指对立的吗？ : Aesthesticism => 美学主义应该是 为艺术而艺术 不该与社会文化道德有关？ : Diabolism => 真正的文学应该是跟道德 文化有关才是好的文学？ : 因为一直听不出来老师讲的到底是啥dia......在字典找到最可能的字了只是不确定 : 只知道老师在讲的是跟美学主义有关的19th的主义.....请高手帮各忙 quote: "Aestheticsim [...] was a European phenomenon during the latter 19th century that had its chief headquarters in France. In opposition to the dominance of scientific thinking, and in defiance of the widespread in- difference or hostility of the middle-class society of their time to any art that was not useful or did not teach moral values, French writers de- veloped the view that a work of art is the supreme value among human pro- ducts precisely becauses it is self-efficient and has no use or moral aim outside its own being. The end [purpose] of a work of art is simply to ex- ist in its formal perfection; that is, to be beautiful and to be contem- plated as an end in itself. A rallying cry of Aestheticism became the phr- ase 'l'art pour l'art'--art for art's sake" (M. H. Abrams, _A Glossary of Literary Terms 3). 至於跟美学运动所主要反对的对象, 比较像是强调实用价值或道德教化的中产阶级; 不过我觉得直得注意的是, 这些美学运动的propoent, 本身也往往都市中上阶级. 你们老师说的应该是版友推文所说的didacticism; diabolism看字根大概知道跟魔鬼有关, 我想美学运动应该容易被强调道德教训教化 的中上阶级是为魔道吧(XD...) Didacticism"有点"像是唐朝韩愈所提倡的"文以载道"; 英国文学很有名的didacticism的时期大概是18, 19th世纪; 不过说实在的, 文学作品很难只有纯粹的道德实用价值(extrinsic values) or 纯粹的美学价值(intrinsic value), 像Kant那种"纯粹"(pure)的境界, 其实也不容易达到吧. 依照Abrams最简单的定义, "didactic" means "intended to give instruction" (65); 也就是说, to give instruction is to some extent to be didactic, then how about the instruction of being aesthetic in opposition to being useful and moral? -- 纵然阳光可以带给人们希望 但也要心中充满希望 才看得到阳光!! --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.53.136