█ ┌┐ ˙
┌──┐ ││────────────
˙─────────────────┐
│╔═╪╗ └██ 【台大社会系 学术演讲系列】 │
│║˙│║ ██ ˙ FB演讲讯息 http://goo.gl/FSMxB │
└╫─┘║ │
║ ██ │
|
║ ║ 讲题: Towards a Feminist Interpretive Sociology of Sexuality │
∣
╚══╝ │
∣
讲者: Stevi Jackson ┌─┐
∣
˙ 英国约克大学妇女研究中心主任 █─┘
∣ │
∣
主持: 吴嘉苓
┌──┐ │
┌──┐ 台湾大学社会学系副教授
│ ╔╪═╗│
└──█ └─╫┘ ║│
∣
˙ ╚█═╝│
∣
时间: 2011年04月14日 (星期四) 中午12:30-14:00 ┌─┐ │
∣
地点: 台大社会学系馆401会议室 │ │ ╔═╗
˙ ┌┐ └─┘ ██ ║
└─────────────────────────
││ ║ ║
└██
˙ ╚═╝
. ..
══ ★ .════════ ※ 讲者简介 ═════════════
Stevi Jackson gained her BA in Sociology from the University of
Kent in 1972 and her Masters from the University of York in 1973,
after which she returned to Kent to pursue doctoral research on
young women and sexuality. She has retained her interest in
sexuality throughout her career, but has also worked on broader
aspects of feminist theory, on family relationships and on
childhood. In recent years she has begun to develop collaborative
relationships with Asian scholars and an interest in comparative
work on gender, sexuality and social change.
══ ★ .════════ ※ 演讲简介 ═════════════
This paper is based on my recent co-authored book, Theorizing
Sexuality (Open University Press 2010) in which we argue for
recovering the radical insights of the pragmatist/interactionist
tradition and to establish its continued relevance to a distinctively
sociological and feminist analysis of sexuality. The interactionist
approach to sexuality, pioneered by John Gagnon and William Simon,
was the first to offer a fully social understanding of sexuality,
but was subsequently eclipsed by Foucauldian and queer approaches
- yet it has distinct advantages for both feminist and sociological
analysis. As I will argue in this paper, this approach is enables
us to take account of multiple facets of social life, addresses the
actualities of everyday social practices, is flexible enough to
encompass cultural differences and social change and is therefore
ideally suited to grappling with the complexities of contemporary
sexual life in global late modernity.
. ★ ☆
. ════ ˙ ════ ‧ ══════ ★ ══ ˙
. ☆ ★ ☆
*演讲机会难得,另现场前30名有免费小点心,欢迎踊跃参与~
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.120.116
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:40)
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:41)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.120.116
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:41)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.120.116
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:42)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.120.116
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:42)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.120.116
※ 编辑: nakts0123 来自: 59.112.120.116 (03/29 16:43)
1F:推 bj26bj:推一下Stevi Jackson 03/29 19:04
2F:推 teiD:其实很不喜欢明明是来台湾演讲,连个简介也摆英文。 03/31 15:34
3F:→ teiD:到底有没有想要台湾人去听演讲呢? 03/31 15:35
4F:→ akrsw:(离题)1.如果演讲者演讲时是说英文,而且没有中文即时口译, 04/02 11:56
5F:→ akrsw:那麽简介用英文似无不妥。2.当然,我不知道此次演讲是否符合 04/02 11:57
6F:→ akrsw:上面两个条件。3.即使此次演讲符合上面两个条件,楼上t君还 04/02 11:57
7F:→ akrsw:是可以质问「到底有没有想要台湾人去听演讲」,但这就和「简 04/02 11:57
8F:→ akrsw:介是英文」无关了。 04/02 11:57