Hi, FreeBSD is as far as I know, quite unique in using Yarrow to provide a nice, fast CSPRNG for /dev/urandom But OpenSSL, LibreSSL, OpenSSH, and various reimplementations of arc4random(), don't directly use it. They typically take only ~128 bits from /dev/urandom or through other means, to seed a stream cipher, then return the output of that. I understand why Linux, even OpenBSD must do that. Good-quality random bits from the kernel are scarce, so they *must* be stretched somehow. But isn't that essentially what Yarrow does already in FreeBSD? Is there a good reason arc4random_buf() can't take bytes directly from /dev/urandom or sysctl KERN_ARND? Therefore no longer needing to seed first, periodically reseed, or use any stream cipher? There are a few reasons I mention it now: * arc4random relies on the stream cipher being cryptographically strong between reseeds, or else you could guess previous/later output. FreeBSD still uses RC4 for arc4random, and that seems increasingly risky; OpenBSD moved recently to ChaCha-20, but who knows if even that will prove to be safe in the longer term? * after seeding, some arc4random implementations completely forget to reseed after the process forks - the same 'random' stream of bytes could occur twice, with security implications * LibreSSL tried to detect forking, and to reseed automatically, but Andrew Ayer showed a corner-case where that still didn't work as expected (CVE-2014-2970) * some arc4random implementations might not be thread-safe * (re)seeding can fail sometimes (fd's exhausted reading /dev/urandom, or that is missing in a chroot; even a sysctl might return an error code); OpenSSL and LibreSSL each have 'scary' ways to try to gather entropy in userland as a fallback, especially for Linux; FreeBSD and OpenBSD may have better expectations that the sysctl will work, and maybe raise SIGKILL otherwise So I wonder, could a simplified arc4random for FreeBSD use Yarrow directly, to avoid making any of these sorts of mistakes we've seen? (There's also the benefit that having many readers from a single pseudorandom stream, adds an additional kind of randomness to its output). This is obviously a complex issue, and some of it will be subjective. But I welcome your comments. Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"