On 01.05.14 16:33, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On May 1, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Uwe Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I indeed wondered why this variable hadn't been mentioned so far. Guys, >> you do have "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes" in your "/etc/make.conf", haven't you? >> >> Because otherwise the whole thread might be considered a false alert. >> The ports system does not link with the ports' OpenSSL of its own >> accord. Or at least not in a reliable/predictable manner. You have to >> explicitly tell it what you want. > > Please consider whether it is appropriate to chide people for not knowing about an *undocumented* feature of make.conf. First of all, I certainly didn't intend to chide anyone, so I apologize if some of you got the impression. Having worked with FreeBSD and the ports system for years I was under the impression that this information would be readily available in the docs. But on further research it appears to me that this is indeed pretty well hidden in only some mailing list and forum articles, where I probably learned it from in the past. Having realized that, I now wonder how many people run half-broken systems because they didn't know about this and didn't notice the wrong and sometimes even mixed linking of the OpenSSL libs. > I'll turn in a pr for it. Good idea. I would think that this should be mentioned at least in "pkg-descr" of the "openssl" port, where it gets displayed by "portmaster" and perhaps other port management tools after each install. Best regards, Uwe -- Uwe Doering [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"