Bryan Drewery <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/14/2014 7:32 AM, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > > > > As to the specific question, I don't think his ego would allow a bug > > in openssh to persist, so even if it does, I'd suspect it's not too > > serious (or it's non-trivial to exploit), and it's related to FreeBSD > > produced 'glue'. > > > > This is total guesswork on my part, but I'd therefore assume he was > > talkining about openssh in base, rarther than openssh-portable in > > ports. > > > > As the maintainer of the port I will say that your security decreases > with each OPTION/patch you apply. I really would not be surprised if one > of the optional patches available in the port had issues. Ahhhh. good point. I forgot about third-party patches. Yeah, if he's not just blowing smoke, that would make the most sense. I don't reckon he'd leave an exploit open if it was purely related to the unpatched source - even if there is some quirk which only makes it only applicable to FreeBSD. Still, by not revealing it, he's only potentially hurting the users. I wonder how many blackhats are going to use this thread as a heads-up? Cheers, Jamie _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"