>On 4/14/2014 7:32 AM, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: >> Matt Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My first thought when I saw this was "ego over ethics," which says more >>> about Theo than FreeBSD. >> >> Totally. >> >> I know Theo has a reputation for being 'difficult', but in my opinion, >> this outburst really calls into question his perceived motivations >> regarding secure software. >> >> As to the specific question, I don't think his ego would allow a bug >> in openssh to persist, so even if it does, I'd suspect it's not too >> serious (or it's non-trivial to exploit), and it's related to FreeBSD >> produced 'glue'. >> >> This is total guesswork on my part, but I'd therefore assume he was >> talkining about openssh in base, rarther than openssh-portable in >> ports. >> > >As the maintainer of the port I will say that your security decreases >with each OPTION/patch you apply. I really would not be surprised if one >of the optional patches available in the port had issues. I believe that Theo just browbeat. Reasons? It was looooong ago, I think very few still remember, but Theo definitely does: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2005-March/002719.html _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"