看板FB_security
标 题Re: Firewall Options
发信站NCTU CS FreeBSD Server (Wed Mar 6 17:22:39 2013)
转信站ptt!csnews.cs.nctu!news.cs.nctu!.cs.nctucs.nctu!!freebsdfreebsd.org!ow
--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As stated elsewhere in this thread, there's an PF giant-lock.
On Tue 05 Mar 2013 06:40 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
> This brings up a question I hadn't thought to ask before. How SMP-friendl=
y is
> the current implementation of IPFW? I will be building some routers/firew=
alls
> that will require high performance, and do not want to run into a=20
> situation where
> the firewall is single-threaded (or giant-locked) and becomes a bottlenec=
k.
>=20
> --Brett Glass
--=20
With kind regards,
Ruud Althuizen
--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAlE2/M8ACgkQkqncCMFskRW3qQCfU8znG/CNG8FGQLgHkBTRQTec
SHoAniHfhefl7dpPv3yun/OOOjwvo7Zt
=xZqt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--