On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:49:13AM +0000, John Bayly wrote: > Regarding the 2012 compromise, I'm a little confused as to what was and > wasn't affected: > > >From the release: > > or of any ports compiled from trees obtained via any means other than > > through svn.freebsd.org or one of its mirrors > Does that mean that any ports updated using the standard "portsnap > fetch" may have been affected, I'm guessing yes. > " We have also verified that the most recently-available portsnap(8) snapshot matches the ports Subversion repository, and so can be fully trusted. " _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"