On Wed, Sep 29, 2004, David Pick wrote: > 6) securelevel *is* a great thing but sysadmins are tied to the > hierarchy of levels chosen by the project, and one size does *not* > fit all. As a more general mechanism I would suggest that there > is a kernel-build option for *each* facility that can be locked > by securelevel, which geves the level at which that facility > becomes locked. Great idea. See mac(4). _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"