On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > Neo-Vortex wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > > > > > >>Yes, it would be nice if you could also attach the ipfw.core file. > > > > > > he he, you think hes stupid? core files can contain sensative > > information... also it would be pointless unless we had the exact same > > binary as he had with the same libraries (well, not entirely pointless, > > but easier for him to do it :P) > > > > > > No i was not thinking of anything unethical. He could have inspected the > .core file before sending it. Yes, but say he didnt... and not neccessairly you, but anyone who is subscribed to these forums... > > However, I doubt an ipfw core file would contain sensitive information > (like passwords and etc). What could it contain, the ACL? The ACL is not > secret and who cares anyway? if it is indeed backdoor'd who knows what it could be accessing at the time? > > I'm just interested in possible firewall bugs. yes, but it would be easier to get him to load up gdb and do a backtrace on it as for the whole same version of file and libraries thing... > > Yours, > -- > Alin-Adrian Anton > Spintech Systems > GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"