--sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-05-14 08:40 -0300, Fernando Schapachnik <[email protected]> wro= te: > As everybody is throwing in their favorite anti-spam solutions, here's mi= ne: >=20 > http://www.paganini.net/ask/ >=20 > From the home page: > > ASK takes advantage of the fact that most spammers use invalid or > fake "From:" address in their messages. When a new message arrives > and the sender is unknown, ASK sends a "confirmation message" > back, informing the sender that the original message has been > queued, pending confirmation. When the sender confirms (a simple > reply), ASK delivers the original message and adds the sender to a > "whitelist". Further messages from this sender will be immediately > delivered. (I apologize for posting this O/T message.) Here's a well-thought-out argument against systems of this type: Challenge-Response Anti-Spam Systems Considered Harmful http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Rants/challenge-response.html Greg --=20 Gregory S. Sutter The best way to accelerate Windows mailto:[email protected] is at 9.8 m/s^2. http://zer0.org/~gsutter/=20 --sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFApcIaIBUx1YRd/t0RArzdAJ4ygartbGdrk8ID1JcVXiudFKdJ4gCfTsnz 6jfGVekoc2ODZCec1MeAfz0= =cYTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sXc4Kmr5FA7axrvy--