On Thu, 13 May 2004 08:46:40 -0400 James Stephenson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 21:00, Jesper Wallin wrote: > > > I've checked the configuration file for SpamAssassin, but yet I havn't find any good > > solution for spam.. Sure, spam will always be a problem and I guess it's impossible to > > filter 100% of all spam.. > > Jesper: [.. about how good dspam is ...] > It works extremely well, but it takes a while to train. I've had mine > up for three days now, and it is increasing in accuracy with each day. > You just have to make sure that you forward all your e-mails to the spam > alias when you receive them, and all false positives as well, or else it > will be worthless. Check out the web site, maybe it will help explain > it a bit more. One note - the documentation is not that good, so set up > could be a bit of a hassle. You may want to look in the ports@ archives where a recent discussion about dspam has taken place. On nice thing is that recent version of amavis-new can run dspam. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"