On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > And the fact that optind is initially set to 1. I wonder what > could be the implications for setuid programs. There could be > quite unpredictable results, as the "argv" pointer is incorrectly > advanced in this case, and at least several setuid programs that > I've glanced at are vulnerable to this attack. See also: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=33738 Marc _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"