作者war23 (一样的夏天)
看板Economics
标题Re: [请益] IS-LM-BP
时间Sat Dec 5 03:26:06 2009
※ 引述《betray911015 (回头太难)》之铭言:
: Use your understanding of the IS-LM-BP model to answer this question.
: Assume at the initial equilibrium that output is above the target level
: of output and that a private payment surplus exists. Given this
: information, we know with certainty that which of the following policy
: actions will simultaneously achieve both internal and external balance?
: a) increase in the nominal money supply
: b) reduction in the nominal money supply
: c) increase in government expenditures
: d) reduction in government expenditures
: e) more information is needed to answer this question
: 题目说一开始的均衡产出在目标的水准之上,接下来的意思我就不懂了
: 题目是要问什麽??
答案是 d) reduction in government expenditures
这题是说目前的产出超出自然水准
而原因是a private payment surplus exists
姑且不论是因为overinvetment or overconsumption所造成
这都表示是过度的民间支出推升了IS
Y=G+(I+C)+Net EX
降低政府支出G即可拉回IS并恢复自然平衡
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 129.2.175.75
1F:推 octopusy:请问private payment surplus是代表过度投资吗? 12/05 10:42
2F:→ war23:依照字义是可以说是民间投资或消费,或者两者相加 12/05 23:31
3F:推 BelArt:请问为什麽b不行呢 这题没有说是固定or浮动汇率制度 而且政 12/06 02:30
4F:→ BelArt:府支出减少不是会使利率降低 民间投资更高(crowding in)?? 12/06 02:31
今天如果是过度民间支出推升产出的话,减少货币供给会使LM曲线往左并且使利率飙高
产出虽然回到自然水准,但是那是以超高利率抑制,并不是自然平衡
政府支出减少会使利率降低没错
但是今天如果推升主因是过度民间支出
政府支出的减少不至於降低利率太多
政府支出减少的部分应该还是大过较低利率下增加的民间支出
※ 编辑: war23 来自: 68.49.41.127 (12/06 08:53)