作者decolonize (decolonize)
看板EV
标题[汽车]Tesla 4680 vs 2170 battery cell test
时间Mon Nov 21 13:56:00 2022
简单说是此时此刻4680的电量密度比2170低,244 wh/kg : 269 wh/kg,但是存在成本优
势一组电池包少了3600美金,并且会持续扩大到5500美金。
个人觉得便宜的电动车浪潮可能会比想像中的快袭来,类似46xx尺寸的电池技术不会只有
特有,对岸宁德时代也在规划帮BMW做印象中是4690的电池,2025年和油车在价格上黄金
交叉可能不会被原物料那些影响,鸿海的平价电动车也加油
啊对了这篇文章电黑车板应该90%人看不懂,笑,他们只看的懂对岸来源堪虑的简体字讯
息
Tesla 4680 vs 2170 battery cell test reveals lower energy density in the Texas
-made Model Y
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Tesla-4680-vs-2170-battery-cell-test-reveals-low
er-energy-density-in-the-Texas-made-Model-Y.669162.0.html
Those Model Y buyers who queue for an Austin-made unit with the 'revolutionary
' 4680 battery cell may be in for a disappointment. A teardown and analysis of
one such cell returned lower energy density than that of the Model Y with 217
0 battery. Still, Tesla benefits from the lower per-pack price.
After a Model Y cell-to-chassis 4680 battery platform teardown that revealed i
t's nigh impossible to replace the pack's individual battery cells, now those
same cells were tested for energy density and chemical composition, confirming
the somewhat disappointing results from previous 4680 teardowns. It turns out
that Tesla's touted 4680 battery has lower energy density than the tried-and-
true 2170 cells it's been putting in its electric vehicles en masse.
The analysis returned 244 Wh/kg energy density for an almost new Model Y 4680
battery cell, compared to 269 Wh/kg for the ubiquitous Panasonic 2170 cells th
at Tesla uses in its long-range vehicles here in the US. This jibes with recen
t revelations that the main reason Tesla is using 4680 batteries at the moment
is to cut manufacturing costs, rather than any of the other pie-in-the-sky ad
vantages announced on Battery Day a few years back.
A Model Y's 4680 pack, for instance, is US$3,600 cheaper to manufacture than o
ne with 2170 cells, but even then Tesla is only halfway through with the cost
reduction potential of the new technology. It has yet to master and scale the
dry-coating cathode method which would bring the pack's cost down US$5,500 com
pared to the 2170 battery.
For now, the battery that is in the Model Y assembled in the Austin factory is
cheaper to produce than the 2170-equipped units because the larger cells allo
w for manufacturing efficiencies resulting in a lighter pack. The Tesla 4680 c
ell analysis found it to have thicker walls than its 2170 counterpart, as the
cell-to-chassis technology actually uses the cans as structural packs for the
vehicle. That's one small reason for its lower energy density, offset by using
a much thicker cathode in the 4680 cell, unfortunately still made with the sl
ower and expensive wet-coating method.
The thicker cathode only bumps the 4680 capacity by 15% compared to the one in
the 2170 cell, though, as it uses less nickel in its chemical composition. In
stead, there is more of the expensive but less efficient cobalt for reasons th
at might have to do with the recent challenges in nickel supply. The other big
reason for the superior energy density of Panasonic's 2170 cells is that they
have 10% silicon in their anode, whereas the 4680 unit has none.
All in all, however, if accounting for all those structural and chemical compo
sition differences, the 4680 and 2170 battery cells that Tesla uses have prett
y similar adjusted energy density. It's just that the 4680 is not currently li
ving up to its full potential but for its cost benefits that keep Tesla's prof
it margins intact.
Tesla may have other Model Y versions with a 4680 battery in the works, though
, as it was just granted three Certificates of Conformity for the 2023 Model Y
by the EPA. These include an AWD Model Y Long Range, as well as an AWD Model
Y Performance and an AWD Model Y, too. Let's not forget that the 4680 cell sou
rced for this analysis was produced over the summer, and the production method
s may be improved for the new 2023 Model Y versions, too.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 111.82.161.253 (台湾)
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/EV/M.1669010162.A.EC5.html
※ 编辑: decolonize (42.76.249.235 台湾), 11/21/2022 14:07:03
1F:→ aggressorX: 原来4680能量密度反而低吗 不是全面提升? 11/21 15:29
2F:→ decolonize: 猜想是技术上的问题还没克服,以後应该会升上去 11/21 16:04
3F:推 KBchen: 能量密度本来就比较低 是体积变大总能量高而已11/21 16:24
4F:→ RunForestRun: 大规模量产前都是画大饼11/21 19:40
5F:→ hiphoprover: CATL帮BMW做两款4690和46120,120会拿来搭配大型休旅 11/22 03:31
6F:推 HyDroGen2528: 推4680的主要目的不是为了降成本吗 11/22 07:58
7F:推 carllace: 磷酸锂的能量密度比不上三元锂啊 11/22 13:35
8F:→ carllace: 三元锂的钴酸太贵,四元锂或磷酸锂都是以降低成本为主 11/22 13:37
内文有看到说钴的含量减少,可是好像没看到说原因是这些,如果是的话很乐意听听
9F:推 kids1991: 长姿势11/22 15:09
10F:→ hiphoprover: 4680主要是降成本没错,而且BMW自己也说采用新电池之11/22 17:53
11F:→ hiphoprover: 後成本最多可以降低50% 但我想车价应该不会降 XD 11/22 17:55
12F:推 YCL13: 4680的优点电池组的结构更简单,省下的结构应该可以补目前 11/22 21:08
13F:→ YCL13: 能量密度的差距吧 11/22 21:08
※ 编辑: decolonize (223.138.223.225 台湾), 11/22/2022 22:35:04
14F:推 carllace: 磷酸锂铁电池不用钴啊,四元锂是用铝减少钴的量 11/22 22:40
15F:推 linbryan: 应该这样説.成本降低.能量密度降低. km/kwatt也降低.但 11/23 16:27
16F:→ linbryan: 最前者比最後者重要很多.所以整体来讲是正面的 11/23 16:27
17F:→ GOPOL: 本来也想等4680 但是看到国外实测 似乎没差多久 就下订了 11/23 19:56
18F:→ GOPOL: 而且LR和性能版样全面采用4680不知道要等到多久 11/23 19:57
19F:推 carllace: 能量密度低,安全性相对高,串并成大电池後可以减少一些 11/23 21:27
20F:→ carllace: 保护措施的重量 11/23 21:27
21F:推 gso1987: 看单颗电池没意义 要用整体电池包和结构来看 4680 & stru 11/24 23:00
22F:→ gso1987: ctural pack可以省下原本保护电池的结构重量 11/24 23:00