作者prudencemf ( )
看板EMS
标题[转录][转录]Re: [新闻] 半罩式安全帽 较不伤颈椎
时间Thu Dec 20 08:40:21 2007
作者: momo2585 (培养气质的桔喵) 看板: PingTung
标题: [转录]Re: [新闻] 半罩式安全帽 较不伤颈椎
时间: Thu Dec 20 03:13:46 2007
前几天由中时发表的一篇新闻,
指出如标题所示的:半罩式安全帽 较不伤颈椎
相关连结:
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071218/4/q48y.html
(连结无毒)
但是经过东机车友向此篇新闻里的
Dr. Yang 求证之後,
我们的妓者误解了 Dr. Yang 的本意了...
以下为东机车友与 Dr. Yang 信件来往的内容,
再加上 Biker 的乡长 - Haiker,
为了看不懂英文的乡民所做的
结论。
----------
※ [本文转录自 biker 看板]
作者: Haiker (单纯偏执狂) 看板: biker
标题: Re: [新闻] 半罩式安全帽 较不伤颈椎
时间: Thu Dec 20 02:34:13 2007
转自东吴机研部品板
有板友找到发表原文的教授
也取得回应并同意公开此段回信:p
都是原文,看得懂的就看
不想看英文的
结论我直接告诉大家,
原教授同意全罩式是优於半罩or3/4(open face)
"I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets."
----
杨博士已同意在所有区域公开其回应
但是为求谨慎 请各位转录时 请把全文转录
由於是回应我的信件 恳请各位一并把我的信件附上 把过程全部呈现
以下是全文
From:
[email protected]
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: about full-face motorcycle helmets, response from Taiwan
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:48:15 -0500
Can you please give me the URL for what I was supposed to have said.
I don't recall saying that full-faced motorcycle helmets
are more dangerous than open-faced ones.
I may have been misinterpreted or misquoted.
I remember talking to a reporter in Taiwan about how modern helmets
have higher backs and that this is a good because it reduces
the risk of spinal cord injury.
I was referring only to the rear and praised this development.
I believe that full-faced helmets are better than open helmets.
Wise.
我的再回覆
Hi, I didn't expect that you replied so soon.
I have to apologize for misunderstanding you.
Our reporters did not do their job well and
made her report being misleading and let you take the heat.
There has been so many mortorcyclist saying sth bad about you.
I will explaine your reply to them on the bbs or other websites.
Is it ok that I post your reply on those bbs systems or websites?
Here is the link of the article.
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/071218/4/q48y.html
Sorry, I shouldn't say 'your article'. It's a report of our reporters.
Dustin Wu.
杨的再回覆
Yes, you may quote me.
Wise.
有没有哪位板友熟悉媒体界的,让他去爆看看
误导误很大....
--
Blog Open
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/Haiker1207
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.143.93.240
1F:推 guithawk:英文真好....(跪) 218.172.58.36 12/20 02:38
2F:推 momo2585:接转录应该很像你说的全部都附上的意思吧 122.126.15.214 12/20 02:40
3F:→ momo2585:........我居然脑残把水球内容用推文送出 122.126.15.214 12/20 02:41
4F:推 WlshCloud:推 不过杨教授英文更漂亮XD 140.130.198.5 12/20 02:42
※ momo2585:转录至看板 NZJH_32TH305 12/20 02:42
5F:推 mb070:要不要转到八卦版啊 感觉会来Biker的都懂 61.230.169.222 12/20 02:44
6F:→ mb070:八卦版应该有比较多会被误导的人 61.230.169.222 12/20 02:45
7F:→ Haiker:请便:p 220.143.93.240 12/20 02:45
8F:→ Haiker:越多人知道越好....:p 220.143.93.240 12/20 02:45
9F:推 momo2585:感谢乡长借我转录..希望推广安全帽:) 122.126.15.214 12/20 02:45
※ Haiker:转录至看板 SuperBike 12/20 02:46
※ mb070:转录至看板 Gossiping 12/20 02:47
※ xxxEVA:转录至看板 FJ_Astroclub 12/20 02:59
※ imanikki:转录至看板 media-chaos 12/20 03:09
※ momo2585:转录至看板 ChungLi 12/20 03:12
※ Haiker:转录至看板 Kaohsiung 12/20 03:12
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.126.15.214
※ 编辑: momo2585 来自: 122.126.15.214 (12/20 03:15)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.143.244.140
※ 编辑: prudencemf 来自: 220.143.244.140 (12/20 08:41)
10F:→ prudencemf:记者弄错,真害人不浅... 12/20 18:09
11F:推 cloud6564:请问全罩优於3/4的原因是为什麽? 01/26 00:56