作者cavaliers (cavaliers)
看板CultureShock
标题Re: 政治能问吗
时间Thu Jun 29 10:20:47 2006
※ 引述《iambeetle (beetle)》之铭言:
: I assume that you prefer me to reply you in English, so I would it.
: 我假设你想要我用英文回复你,我可以。
: But I notice that there might be some people don't feel comfortable
: 但是我知道可能有一部分人不太适应读一大篇英文,
: reading a whole brunch of English.
: Therefore I will make it into Chinese as well.
: 所以我也会把它翻译称中文, 这样也比较清楚一点。
: Just for the sake of clearness.
: ------------------------
: At first, I was quite shock that how could you be so cocky and absolute.
: 刚开始,我很惊讶你为甚麽可以这麽自大和绝对化自己想法。
: However, I read it again and I think I know the reason why.
: 但是我又读了一边以後,我觉得我知道为甚麽了。
: You are either heavily brianwashed, or you knows basically nothing.
: 你要不然是完全被洗脑了,就是根本甚麽都不知道。
: I am not gonna argure with you based on hisotry, since I have said that
: history is not accurate.
: 我不会跟你理论历史,因为我已经说过历史其实本来就不准确。
: However, I would like to talk about it based on your logic.
: 但是我会将你的逻辑来讨论。
: ※ 引述《lerudit (l'Erudit)》之铭言:
: : Are you going to talk about the history or the future?
: : It is not very difficult to clarify it.
: It's very hard to clarfy it, i would say.
: 其实,我会说,历史是很难被认证的。
: Not only the history of P.R.China and Taiwan, but also the world history,
: has always been argued over decades.
: 不只是中国和台湾的历史,就连世界历史,这麽久以来一直被争论着。
: I was surprised that it seems so easy to solve to you.
: 我很惊讶你会觉得对於历史问题这麽容易就可以解决。
: Then what are those historians and professors doing for such a long time?
: slacking off? (lol)
: 如果是这样,那麽这麽久以来,这麽多的历史学家和教授都在做些甚麽?
: 偷懒吗? (笑)
: : In the past, for most of the time, Taiwan has been independently existant
: : in the world.
: : There were Dutch, Koxinga, Chin, Japanese and Chiang ever controlling Taiwan.
: : However, only the last two can fully control most of Taiwan.
: : (Remember, 2/3 of Taiwan is mountains. The first reliable sea level
: : determination was by Japanese.)
: : Chinese did build something in Taiwan, such as railway; however, at the same
: : time, they were removing railway off from their country.
: : Everybody knows Taiwan was ceded to Japan in 1895.
: : I don't like Chinese always arguing for price or bargain;
: : I don't like Chinese always leaving rubbish everywhere;
: : If you Chinese do want to buy something, pay for it or go away.
: : If you Chinese do decide to give up something, don't go to ask it back someday.
: : Else, don't give up then.
: : What do you think we Taiwanese are?
: Are you dissing Chinese people here? Where is your hatred from?
: 你现在是在针对中国百姓吗?你对中国普通百姓的憎恨是怎麽来的?
: What is wrong with bargaining? That is a part of culture.
: 讲价有甚麽不好的?这甚至是文化的一部分。
: And your stereotype is very bad. There are clean and beatiful cities in China.
: 你对中国的印象真的很差,虽然我不知道是哪里来的。
: 中国也有很多漂亮而且干净的城市。
我相信 但同时世界十大污染城市 中国也有七个
source: CNN
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/04/27/eyeonchina.
environment/index.html
当然你也可以怀疑CNN对中国的公正性
: If you want to talk about politics, don't blame people.
: 如果你是要讲政府和政治,那就不要把怪罪到百姓人民身上。
: : Yes, the history has been interpreted very differently..
: : It is not difficult to clarify, else they won't be able to do any interpreting.
: : If you are talking about 'believe' or 'not believe', then we are at different
: : level.
: : I would talk about 'consideration', 'evidences' and 'research'.
: : I may still believe or not believe something, but would think of the reasons.
: Regarding to what you said above,
: 对於你上面所说的,
: I think you have made a big mistake here.
: 我觉得你犯了一个大错误。
: The fact that History can be interpreted doesn't mean that history
: can be interpreted correctly.
: 历史可以被理解这事实并不代表历史一定可以被 正确 理解。
: The history itself is ambiguous, if you force to interprete it one-way only,
: there must be bias inyour interpretation.
: 历史本来就是很多面化和很模糊(不好意思我真的不知道怎麽翻译ambiguous)
: ,如果你硬是要单一化的理解历史,那你的理解一定会有偏见。
: And I don't understand that you said you would talk about "considerations",
: "evidance" and "research", because you have not.
: 我不明白你为甚麽说你会讲"considerations", "evidance" 和 "research",
: 因为很明显你并没有。
: And if you have done your research, I am sure that you won't get so cocky
: anymore. Because there are a lot of sides and bias in the source.
: It overwhelms you.
: 如果你有做研究的话,那我敢保证你不会再这麽自大。 因为当你在找资料的时候,
: 你会发现有很多不同的版本和偏见,立场。 你根本不能应付过来。
: : I suggest you just go away and talk to your president then.
: : If he agrees to give up to invade Taiwan or any attacks, we will not have
: : to buy any weapons from the US.
: : Mr Chinese, we are quite happily living here. If there is any difficulty,
: : that is basically by you, or your government.
: First of all, I don't like your words "invade" and "attacks",
: 首先,我很不喜欢你的字眼“侵略”和“攻击”,
: because we have not invaded or attacked Taiwan.
: 因为我们并没有“侵略”或“攻击”台湾。
: The fact is we even suggest peace. Also, at least until now,
: we haven't started a war.
: 我们甚至提倡和平,并且到现在为之,我们并没有发起战争。
拿着700颗飞弹对着人 然後说提倡和平
就像是拿着一把刀架在人家脖子上 然後说我没要动手
同样的问题你可以问问日本人或是南韩人
: But I would like to ask you one question.
: 但是我想问你一个问题,
: Althought Taiwan has bought weapons from the US, do you think those weapon
: can protect you? Are they even competitive?
: 就算台湾有跟美国买武器,你觉得它们真的有用吗?真的能招架得住?
要战台湾不会赢的 大家都清楚 台湾军队烂的很 但是不买
难道就让解放军直接开坦克进台北毫无招架之力?
让700颗飞弹落在台湾 一颗也挡不下来
但是拿个比喻 你会因为世界盃要遇到巴西队就不踢了 直接0-3任人宰割吗?
: The US sells you weapons for money.
: As long as they gets money, they are happy doing it.
: 美国是为了赚钱才卖给你武器。 只要它们能转到钱,它们就开心了。
: : No. If I ask a question:
: : Do you call 'my dearest' to every girl?
: : Then, do you think they will feel you are friendly if you do that?
: : Get your brain geared up, please, Mr Chinese.
: I don't think your example helps you.
: 我并不觉得你得例子有任何用处。
: It makes non-sense.
: 这个例子根本就不是在说同样的东西, 事实上,这例子我根本不能理解。
: Do we call "my dearest" to every girl? No, we don't.
: 我们真的都叫女生“my dearest”吗?根本不是。
: By the way, I have a name for you to call. No need to call me "Mr. Chinese"
: 顺便说一下,我有名字,你不用一直叫我“Mr. Chinese”.
: : If you are governed by foreigner, such as japanese or whatever, I will accept
: : this excuse. Unfortunately, you are governed by Chinese government, which is
: : even called 'People's Government'.
: : Which government else is 'more of people' than yours?
: : You got many political parties meeting every year or every day in so grand
: : hall, and never heard they are arguing for anything. Everything agreed 99%.
: : How can we believe that everything is due to the government but not the people.
: : By the way, if you can take off the 'People' on the title, and go to argue
: : or protesst in your parliament, I will believe what you said. OK?
: : I am not laughing at you.
: : Democracy is a very good status, but you can not get it for free.
: : Do something for your own country, for your neighbour's sakes.
: Chinese people supports the government when it is doing the right thing.
: 中国人民在中国政府做正确的事情的时候,就支持中国政府。
我相信这点 但做不正确事情的时候 也似乎没什麽办法
: Till now, for the most of the part, Chinese government is helping the
: 到现在为之,中国政府的确在帮助中国发展,所以我们支持。
中国的经济发展速度目前的确无庸置疑
: country to develop. Therefore we support it.
: Over 85% of people support the current goverment in China.
: 超过百分之85的人民支持自己的政府。
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^可以请问一下资料出处吗 不会是新华社吧
: Chinese government fulfills Chinese people's demand.
: 中国政府的确实现了很多中国人民的目标。
: What about your government?
: If you are so happy about your government, answer the question.
: 如果你是这麽支持自己的政府,那你告诉我,
: What is the percentage that people support the curent govenment?
: 台湾现任政府民意指数多少?
很差 的确很差 不过做不好就靠选举换人换党 我想"政府" 跟"执政党"可以是两回事
人民对执政党不满 但是不代表想换"政府" 假如那是你的暗示
我不敢说台湾的民主举机制成熟 但是他的确是相对下的可以被台湾人接受
另外回你的推文 台湾政府要洗脑台湾民众 在以前的确是很容易 报禁党禁都是
现在...? 媒体自由 言论自由已经是自由到不像话的地步了 至少台湾这边
要接收世界各种资讯不会有限制 政府不敢在网路上设限 不会莫名其妙抓
所谓异议份子 你要统要独 都可以发表自己意见 要用政府洗脑这个字眼
显然还差的远
: After all, I am not saying Chinese government always do the right thing.
: 但是,说到底,我并不是在说中国政府一直都是很正确的。
: There are evil sides of the government too. Just like any other government.
: 中国政府也有做一些不好的事情,就像所有国家的政府一样。
: But I have a piece of advice for you.
: 但是我想要给你一个建议,
: Put down your pride. Stop being so cocky, you will learn more.
: 收起你的骄傲和自大心。 要是你谦虚一点,你可以学到更多东西。
看完您两篇大作 第一篇感觉您还理性 至少就我认识的大陆人来说
看完这篇 又觉得很失望 因为你的说法 大概跟中国政府官方说法大同小异
没什麽新意
在加拿大网路应该没什麽限制 可以多看看台湾这边的新闻 blog bbs
看看台湾人是怎麽想的 还有台湾人是不是真的天真地被政府洗脑
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.229.173.170
1F:推 iambeetle:世界杯的比喻不行吧?这里有一个美国在捣乱和抽钱啊~ 06/29 10:25
2F:→ iambeetle:在加拿大我也看蛮多台湾新闻的~哈哈~ XD 06/29 10:25
3F:推 iambeetle:我有想过台湾多政党的情况,媒体有没有可能被政党买通, 06/29 10:28
4F:→ iambeetle:而用来攻击竞争对手?我不是说这是事实,只是我乱想而已 06/29 10:28
5F:→ iambeetle:但是如果是这样的传媒,大概不会报道有利“回归”的报道 06/29 10:29
6F:→ iambeetle:因为政党都想要生存,但是要是“回归”,那就抱着一起死 06/29 10:30
7F:→ iambeetle:了啊。。这些可能都是我乱想啦~~随便说一下而已~ 06/29 10:31
8F:→ iambeetle:毕竟我真的从台湾的新闻里面听到很多中国政府没有说过的 06/29 10:33
9F:→ iambeetle:东西,而且都很煽动和引起两岸的误解 06/29 10:33
10F:推 Agneta:中国要是一天没有民主自由 要统一根本不用谈没有人要倒退活 06/29 10:47
11F:→ Agneta:台湾新闻这麽多台 要误导也不是很简单的事情 一定被踢爆 06/29 10:48
12F:推 iambeetle:被谁踢爆? 06/29 10:51
13F:→ iambeetle:倒退活?但是怎麽证明社会主义比资本主义差? 06/29 10:51
14F:推 HoJinChang:怎麽证明贵国可以代表真正的社会主义?! 不要笑死人了 06/29 10:53
15F:→ ventelp:果然这种议题很容易吵起来.... 06/29 10:57
16F:推 HoJinChang:到目前为止没有!@#$%^的字眼出现应该还好吧 XD 06/29 10:58
17F:→ Agneta:至少我在这里有投票权 有抗争有选择的自由 中国人有吗 06/29 10:59
18F:→ Agneta:中国已经不是正统的社会主义了 早就朝资本方向修正 06/29 10:59
19F:推 HoJinChang:不只是修正,对於某些教条是选择性删除 06/29 11:02
20F:推 bluekangaroo:台湾政府或是执政党对人民的洗脑可不少阿... 06/30 01:58
21F:→ bluekangaroo:所以说什麽人民不易被洗脑了也只是自欺欺人 06/30 01:59
22F:推 evendie:台湾的媒体其实超自闭的 不是洗脑也是愚民了... 06/30 08:33
23F:推 a9063005:我也同意楼上的观感 的确是自闭的白痴媒体 错误百出 07/03 12:16