※ 引述《frothy (frothy)》之铭言： : ※ 引述《lerudit (l'Erudit)》之铭言： : : This seems to be OK. : : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=29178&dict=CALD : : http://www.ldoceonline.com/ : 可是通常鱼种才会说fishes，只是很多条鱼是说fish。 : (cambridge第一个例句就是这麽举例的 : 我没听过there are several fishes in the pond这种说法耶) : 我另一个加拿大朋友Ian也这麽跟我说的。 : ---- : 难道是地区性语言使用上的不同 -_-" Are you sure? I think, if this rule does exist in common English, Those dictionary editors should have already included this into those dictionaries (and certainly given examples to demonstrate the difference). Now, I found no clue for this rule in Oxford English Dictionary. All of them just suggest it can be fish or fishes. Copied from the Longman dictionary: "Over 1,500 different species of fish inhabit the waters around the reef." Is this saying a sort of fish as well? Don't just believe a person... check more people. I might be wrong as well. However, does it really matter fish or fishes? What point? At least, I don't think this is a very good point to judge a people's native language ability. Else, there could be a very significant of Taiwanese would be classified as bad Taiwanese speakers. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 81.111.56.53