作者jodawa (jodaway)
看板Cognitive
标题Re: [请益] 问题请教 有关split brain分裂半脑的手 …
时间Wed Feb 16 16:39:08 2011
The effect, in the words of one surgeon, was the creation of "two separate
spheres of consciousness".(注:Sperry,p229.)
This effect was revealed by various psychological tests. These made of
two facts. We control our right arms with our left hemispheres, and vice
versa. And what is in the right halves of our visual fields we see with
our left hemispheres, and vice versa. When someone's hemispheres have been
disconnected, psychologists can thus present to this person two different
written questions in the two halves of his visual field, and can receive two
different answers writtenby this person's two hands.
Here is a simplified version of the kind of evidence that such tests
provide. One of these people is shown a wide screen, whose left half is red
and right half is blue. On each half in a darker shade are the words,
'How many colours can you see?' With both hands the person writes, 'Only
one'. The words are now change to read, 'Which is the only colour that you
can see?' With one of his hands the person writes 'Red', with the other he
writes 'Blues'.
Derek Parfit,<Reasons and Persons>, p.245.
以上是这位哲学家的书中的一段,第一句是他说有一位外科医生所提出的对这个手术
的结论:'产生两个不同领域的意识'。(这个外科医生是Sperry?)
第二、三段是他认为有些心理实验证明此事,以及他自己提出的这些心理实验的简化版本
(依照他对这个手术结果的理解)。
请问各位大大这样的理解是否恰当?但是这本书有点久了,198几年的书,所以我想问问
这样的看法是否正确?到现在有没有更进一步的研究结果?
谢谢
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.121.96
1F:推 guare:学科学的人得分清楚什麽是实验结果,什麽是对结果的解释。结 02/16 17:00
2F:→ guare:果除非是出了错,或者控制条件不同,应该都有一定可靠性。至 02/16 17:01
3F:→ guare:於解释就众说纷纭了。你与其问板友这个看法是否「正确」,不 02/16 17:02
4F:→ guare:如讲讲你「自己」的看法。你也可以建立你自己的解释呀!何必 02/16 17:03
5F:→ guare:都听别人的说法。 02/16 17:03
6F:→ jodawa:抱歉,或许我解释得不够清楚,我有两个问题。第一个问题是 02/16 17:41
7F:→ jodawa:Parfit所提出的心理实验简化版本其原版为何?是否真的发生过 02/16 17:42
8F:→ jodawa:Parfit自己提出的简化版本的涵义是否符合原版实验的涵义。 02/16 17:43
9F:→ jodawa:第二个问题则是这样的实验大家认为对其恰当的解释为何? 02/16 17:44
10F:→ jodawa:我也有自己的想法,但是也想听听大家的意见,谢谢。 02/16 17:45