作者mulkcs (mulkcs)
看板Cognitive
标题[新知] 两个有潜力预测自杀的方法
时间Wed Aug 4 11:11:03 2010
Psychologists Develop Two Potent New Predictors of Suicide Risk
ScienceDaily (July 30, 2010) — Two powerful new tests developed by
psychologists at Harvard University show great promise in predicting
patients' risk of attempting suicide.
The work may help clinicians overcome their reliance on self-reporting by
at-risk individuals, information that often proves misleading when suicidal
patients wish to hide their intentions. Both new tests are easily
administered within minutes on a computer, giving quick insight into how
patients are thinking about suicide, as well as their propensity to attempt
suicide in the near future.
"Experts have long sought a clear behavioral marker of suicide risk," says
Harvard Professor of Psychology Matthew K. Nock, an author of two papers
describing the new assessments of suicidal behavior. "The current approach,
based on self-reporting, leads to predictions that are scarcely better than
chance, since suicidal patients are often motivated to conceal or
misrepresent their mental state. We sought to develop more sophisticated,
objective measures of how psychiatric patients are thinking about suicide.
Our work provides two important new tools clinicians can use in deciding how
to treat potentially suicidal patients."
Nock and colleagues report on the tests in two papers, one in the current
Journal of Abnormal Psychology and a second published in Psychological
Science. Unlike many previous efforts focused on biological markers of
suicidal behavior, their work identifies two behavioral markers: subjects'
attention to suicide-related stimuli, and the extent to which they associate
death or suicide with themselves.
In one study by Nock's group, 124 patients in a psychiatric emergency
department were administered a modified Stroop test measuring speed in
articulating the color of words on a computer screen. Suicidal individuals
were found to pay more attention to suicide-related words than to neutral
words.
"Suicide Stroop scores predicted six-month follow-up suicide attempts above
and beyond well-known risk factors such as a history of suicide attempts,
patients' reported likelihood of attempt, and clinicians' predictions
regarding patients' likelihood of attempt," says co-author Christine B. Cha,
a doctoral student in psychology at Harvard.
A second study adapted the Implicit Association Test developed by Harvard
psychologist Mahzarin R. Banaji, using reaction times to semantic stimuli to
measure 157 subjects' automatic mental associations -- in this case, the
strength of associations between words related to "self" and words related to
either "life" or "death/suicide." Participants were shown pairs of words on a
screen, with response speed revealing unconscious associations between the
terms. For instance, a rapid response to stimuli associating self with
death/suicide suggests a strong unconscious association between the two.
Nock and his colleagues found that those participants with strong
associations between self and death/suicide were six times more likely to
attempt suicide within the next six months than those holding stronger
associations between self and life.
"These findings suggest that a person's implicit cognition may guide which
behavior he or she chooses to cope with extreme distress," Nock says. "More
specifically, an implicit association with death/suicide may represent one of
the final steps in the pathway to suicide."
Nock and Cha were joined on the two recent papers by co-authors Jennifer M.
Park and Christine T. Finn of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts
General Hospital and Sadia Najmi, Tara L. Deliberto, Halina J. Dour, and
Mahzarin R. Banaji of Harvard's Department of Psychology. The work was funded
by the National Institute of Mental Health and the Norlien Foundation.
--
原始网址:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100728111717.htm
这是一篇有趣的文章
前几天看到了,可是没读完就没转上来。
这个哈佛的研究团队企图找寻可以预测自杀的方法。
根据内文现在好得自杀风险是病人的自我报告、病人过去的自杀次数、医师判断。
但本篇提出了另外两种量测风险的方法,
这两种方法不是找寻生物标记(biomarker),
而是利用attention来做行为测试。
一个是stroop test,另一个是"字的联想强度"利用反应时间来测。
第一个研究发现,自杀者在suicide stroop test中对自杀相关字眼会比较注意。
第二个研究发现,若将"self"与"suicide/death"等字有较强的连结的人,六个月内的自杀
企图会有将近六倍。
两篇论文:
Attentional bias toward suicide-related stimuli predicts suicidal behavior.
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/119/3/616/
Measuring the Suicidal Mind Implicit Cognition Predicts Suicidal Behavior
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/03/09/0956797610364762.abstract
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.33.135
1F:推 tomoe07:第二个是用IAT(Implicit Association Test)做的,我一直 08/04 21:28
2F:→ tomoe07:满好奇IAT除了研究之外,有没有可能真的作为一种衡监工具 08/04 21:28
3F:→ tomoe07:毕竟它假设的内隐态度╱认知,真能测量是满诱人的… 08/04 21:29
4F:推 mark89:stroop test怎麽做跟自杀有关的字眼 @@? 08/04 21:36
5F:→ mulkcs:看起来是字有不同颜色 要认颜色 有些人会被字的内容干扰 08/04 23:48
6F:→ mulkcs:我猜是这样 08/04 23:49
7F:→ shoxx:对有自杀意涵或是隐喻的字注意力提高? 让认颜色活动变慢? 08/05 03:34
8F:推 hikaru924:我们会自动被赋有情绪意涵的字词所吸引 自杀倾向高的对 08/05 21:24
9F:推 hikaru924:於与自杀有关的字词更被吸引或是更难拔除注意力 08/05 21:26
10F:→ hikaru924:(disengage) 以致於对於字词颜色的判断受到干扰(这才是 08/05 21:27
11F:→ hikaru924:作业内容) 这可泛称为attentional bias 08/05 21:28
12F:推 tomoe07:顺带请教楼上,所以内文指得presented with suicidal word 08/06 21:10
13F:→ tomoe07:是指在做STROOP时快速闪过自杀相关的字词吗?然後算各RT? 08/06 21:10
14F:推 hikaru924:自残 跳楼 类似这些字词 不过要判断的是这些字词的颜色 08/07 00:33
15F:→ hikaru924:例如:这些字词是由红色蓝色等不同墨水所写的... :) 08/07 00:34
16F:推 tomoe07:原来如此!感谢楼上解答 08/07 21:14