作者df31 (DF-31)
看板Christianity
标题[情报] SBS and Calvinism
时间Tue Nov 14 22:36:22 2017
Neo,
很多这类文章啊!
Here's The Point: Calvinists and Non-Calvinists in the SBC
https://founders.org/2016/05/03/heres-the-point-calvinists-and-non-calvinists-in-the-sbc/
How Calvinism Is Dividing The Southern Baptist Convention
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/06/how-calvinism-is-dividing-the-southern-baptist-convention_n_3399504.html
Are Southern Baptist Calvinists Just Misunderstood?
https://www.christianpost.com/news/southern-baptist-calvinist-misunderstood-richard-land-172140/
(刚好跟您说的相反馁!)
Southern Baptists, Arminians, and Calvinists
http://baptist21.com/blog-posts/2016/southern-baptists-arminians-calvinists/
Will Calvinism Split The Southern Baptist Convention?
http://sbctoday.wpengine.com/will-calvinism-split-the-southern-baptist-convention/
‘Non-Calvinist’ Southern Baptists issue statement of beliefs – by Staff
http://theaquilareport.com/non-calvinist-southern-baptists-issue-statement-of-beliefs-by-staff/
While Calvinists have been present in Southern Baptist life from its earliest
days and have made very important contributions to our history and theology,
【the majority of Southern Baptists do not embrace Calvinism. Even the minority
of Southern Baptists who have identified themselves as Calvinists generally
modify its teachings in order to mitigate certain unacceptable conclusions 】
(e.g., anti-missionism, hyper-Calvinism, double predestination, limited
atonement, etc.). The very fact that there is a plurality of views on
Calvinism designed to deal with these weaknesses (variously described as “
3-point,” “4-point,” “moderate,” etc.) would seem to call for
circumspection and humility with respect to the system and to those who
disagree with it. For the most part, Southern Baptists have been glad to
relegate disagreements over Calvinism to secondary status along with other
important but “non-essential” theological matters. The Southern Baptist
majority has fellowshipped happily with its Calvinist brethren while kindly
resisting Calvinism itself. And, to their credit, most Southern Baptist
Calvinists have not demanded the adoption of their view as the standard. We
would be fine if this consensus continued, but some New Calvinists seem to be
pushing for a radical alteration of this long-standing arrangement.
推 neohippie: 美南现在迦尔文是大宗,几乎没有人自称是阿民念的 11/14 22:38
→ neohippie: 有阿民念顷向的应该会离开美南吧 11/14 22:39
→ neohippie: 以前Billy Grahm影响力很强的时代比较顷阿民念 11/14 22:43
→ neohippie: 这个世代的领导者,Mohler、Moore、Piper 都是 11/14 22:44
→ neohippie: 顷向迦尔文 11/14 22:44
推 neohippie:
https://goo.gl/8k4QcZ (美国的新迦尔文主义近代发展) 11/14
22:50
这里有一篇The Calvinism Advisory Committee所撰写的《TRUTH, TRUST, and TESTIMONY in a TIME of TENSION》。SBC Convention建议大家看的。
http://www.sbclife.net/Articles/2013/06/sla5
【We must stand together in rejecting any form of hyper-Calvinism that denies
the mandate to present the offer of the Gospel to all sinners or that denies
the necessity of a human response to the Gospel that involves the human will. 】
Similarly, we must reject any form of Arminianism that elevates the human
will above the divine will or that denies that those who come to faith in
Christ are kept by the power of God. How do we know that these positions are
to be excluded from our midst? Each includes beliefs that directly deny what
The Baptist Faith and Message expressly affirms.
这里讲的很清楚,SBC要全力抵制极端加尔文主义(Hyper-Calvinism),而
John Piper是Hyper-Calvinism的主要代表人物。照您的讲法,SBC现在整个
倒向了Hyper-Calvinism?但是,事实并不是这样啊!是不是您的信息来源
有误?
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 101.9.250.119
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Christianity/M.1510670189.A.B2B.html
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 22:42:34
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:03:44
1F:→ sCHb68: 原来John Piper是Hyper-Calvinism?! 11/14 23:12
https://www.challies.com/articles/hyper-calvinism-a-brief-definition/
Hyper-Calvinism: A Brief Definition
【While most Calvinists hold to the five points of Calvinism as summarized by
the acronym TULIP, there are some who refer to themselves as six or
seven-point Calvinists. One person who is known to identify himself as a
seven-point Calvinist is John Piper.】 He does so half-jokingly but does so to
communicate a truth that the five points of Calvinism are not exhaustive in a
consideration of God’s sovereign saving grace. The Desiring God web site
says, “Piper isn’t seeking to add two more points, but is simply calling
attention to his belief in the traditional five points (total depravity,
unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and
perseverance of the saints) in a way that also points toward two additional ‘
Calvinistic’ truths that follow from them: double predestination and the
best-of-all-possible worlds.” Double predestination is widely considered the
sixth-point. It is simply the other side to predestination, that just as God
sovereignly chooses those whom He will save, in the same way he chooses those
whom He will not save. There are some Calvinists who reject this idea, saying
that God chooses His elect while everyone else makes their own choice to be
condemned. A six-point Calvinist though, believes that God chooses some for
salvation and some for perdition and that He does so not on the basis that
some people are better or worse than others, but simply through His sovereign
choice.
The seventh-point of Calvinism, at least according to John Piper (and I’m
uncertain whether others regard this as the seventh point) is the
best-of-all-possible worlds, which “means that God governs the course of
history so that, in the long run, His glory will be more fully displayed and
His people more fully satisfied than would have been the case in any other
world.” Yet even someone who is willing to extend Calvinism beyond the five
points is not “hyper.” A seven-point Calvinist is not a hyper-Calvinist.
卫敏斯特和老唐这条线是5点的,都已经让人受不了。John Piper更厉害,『7点
加尔文主义(7-Point Calvinism)』。而Hyper1-Calvinism在北美强硬到,连
5点加尔文主义都受不了。
所以,neo提到他,有点让我惊讶。
再补充:
A hyper-Calvinist is one who:
1- Denies that the gospel call applies to all who hear, OR
2- Denies that faith is the duty of every sinner, OR
3- Denies that the gospel makes any “offer” of Christ, salvation, or mercy to
the non-elect (or denies that the offer of divine mercy is free and
universal), OR
4- Denies that there is such a thing as “common grace,” OR
5- Denies that God has any sort of love for the non-elect.
这五点在neo身上都看不到。。。。。。
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:20:22
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:22:20
http://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2016/june/southern-baptists-pick-president-steve-gaines-j-d-greear.html
Evenly Split, Southern Baptists Pick President after Candidate Quits
J. D. Greear withdraws from unusually tight SBC election, making Steve Gaines
the next leader.
SARAH EEKHOFF ZYLSTRA JUNE 15, 2016 11:26 AM
A 2012 survey found that about equal numbers of SBC pastors identify their
congregations as Calvinist/Reformed (30%) or Arminian/Wesleyan (30%). More
than 60 percent of pastors were concerned about Calvinism’s influence on the
denomination.
2016SBC大会选主席的特别报导还使用2012的统计。基本上,30%的SBC牧师
认为自己是加尔文/改革宗,30%是亚米念/卫斯理。而高达60%的牧师担心
加尔文主义对整个SBC的影响。
这里说的跟Neo说的都不一样。:《
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:26:55
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/russell-moore-southern-baptist-convention/519540/
Russell Moore and the Fight for the Soul of the Southern Baptist Convention
The backlash against the conservative evangelical leader reveals deep
tensions in his denomination.
Russell Moore, the head of the Southern Baptist Convention's political arm,
interviews then-presidential candidate Jeb Bush in August 2015 Mark Humphrey
/ AP
EMMA GREEN MAR 14, 2017
On Monday, The Washington Post reported that Russell Moore—the leader of the
Southern Baptist Convention’s political arm—might lose his job. The
denomination’s executive committee had asked Moore for a private meeting to
discuss an unfolding controversy: More than 100 churches are considering
cutting off funding from the Convention, according to the Post, and the
influential Prestonwood Baptist Church in Texas announced in February that it
will temporarily withhold roughly $1 million from the Convention’s
cooperative mission programs. The executive committee has recently begun an
investigation into why these funds are being withheld.
这里说道Russell Moore要被炒鱿鱼了。这篇文章引用一个牧师对他的评价:
“He has singlehandedly caused more division in Southern Baptist life than
what we’ve seen in the last 30 years.”
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:30:04
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:33:07
我估计我们台湾的基督教资讯被扭曲了。
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/14/2017 23:33:43
2F:推 neohippie: 感谢回应 11/15 00:56
3F:→ neohippie: 老渔您引Russell Moore要被炒鱿鱼是跟政治有关的事 11/15 00:58
4F:→ neohippie: Russell Moore 公开在批评川普,所以美南有些人 11/15 00:58
5F:→ neohippie: 要他下台。不过最後不了了之,Moore现在还是在。 11/15 00:59
6F:→ neohippie: 最近的SBC大会他还主导一项争议性议题 11/15 01:00
7F:→ neohippie: 内部我不知道,外面看起来他蛮稳的 11/15 01:00
8F:推 neohippie: 看poll的资料,好像我真的讲错了,阿民念的还蛮多的 11/15 01:04
9F:推 neohippie: 我刚才找了一下,问卷原始资料有点不清楚 11/15 01:09
11F:→ neohippie: 十年前的资料,强烈支持五点迦尔文已经27%了 11/15 01:14
12F:→ neohippie: 我有点搞不清楚,资料是说有 30%是阿民念 11/15 01:14
13F:→ neohippie: 还是解读者把非强烈5点迦尔文通通归类阿民念。 11/15 01:15
14F:→ neohippie: 说自己是迦尔文「顷向」的应该超过 30%了吧? 11/15 01:16
15F:推 neohippie: 不过有些东西应该跟地理环境有关系,我基本上都是在 11/15 01:28
我看过一个统计,说亚米念60%。
16F:→ neohippie: 美国南部,所以可能受SBTS的影响比较大 11/15 01:28
17F:→ neohippie: 西岸那边可能比较多阿民念的吧 11/15 01:29
18F:推 neohippie: .................................... 11/15 01:31
19F:→ neohippie: 澄清一下,我没在宣称说美南倒向 hyper-Calvinism 11/15 01:31
20F:→ neohippie: 只能说是偏迦尔文。 11/15 01:32
22F:→ neohippie: 然後Steve Gains确实不是迦尔文派的... 11/15 01:55
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/15/2017 07:46:06
23F:推 bettis: 52% Strongly disagree ..你是怎麽解读成偏加尔文的? 11/15 09:39
24F:→ theologe: neo常常这样阿,不ey 11/15 09:51
25F:→ theologe: local autonomy真的是关键,不只是事务性的部分而已; 11/15 09:53
26F:→ theologe: neo真的太不认识浸会精神了。 11/15 09:53
不咬人会死哦!
※ 编辑: df31 (101.9.250.119), 11/15/2017 09:55:08
27F:→ sCHb68: 据我观察,三尺喜欢贬低别人提升自己的优越感。 11/15 11:42
28F:→ sCHb68: 这是他生命中的偶像,应该每天攻克己身的对付。 11/15 11:43
29F:推 bettis: 一群人不就事论事真可笑 11/15 11:44
30F:→ sCHb68: ↑您这句话似乎也不是在就事论事欸.. 11/15 12:04
31F:推 bettis: 欢迎你对号入座 11/15 12:08
32F:推 bettis: 对什麽样的人,就用适合他的方式对应? 11/15 12:10
33F:→ bettis: 话说你们搞懂什麽是gateway了吗? 11/15 12:10
34F:→ sCHb68: 你也开始双重标准了喔,好的不学学三尺。 11/15 12:17
35F:推 bettis: 哪里双重标准?请明示 11/15 12:20
36F:推 bettis: 我可没像某人(复数)诬赖别人是分身 11/15 12:22
37F:推 bettis: 都已经提关键字了还硬要丢自己的脸更是一绝 11/15 12:25
38F:→ sCHb68: 人家都走了还在抱怨。 11/15 12:32
39F:推 bettis: 某人(复数)是没看懂吗? 11/15 12:54
40F:推 neohippie: SBTS的领导者是迦尔文主义的,我上面就有写阿 11/15 21:21
41F:→ neohippie: 旗舰神学院是迦尔文主导 11/15 21:21
42F:→ neohippie: 不过资料看起来两派是平手 11/15 21:27
43F:→ neohippie: bettis: 其实两派大约都是 30% 两边图表要对照 11/15 21:28
44F:→ neohippie: 不能只看一边下定论 11/15 21:28
45F:→ neohippie: anyways, 我讲错,我承认 11/15 21:30
46F:→ neohippie: 有学到新东西是好事 11/15 21:30
47F:推 bettis: 推Neo的态度 11/15 21:34