作者theologe (表达你我的信仰~)
看板Christianity
标题[讨论] 基信板随堂小考
时间Sat Nov 11 18:33:04 2017
前言:
基信板来一个随堂小考吧!
1F:推 theologe: df搞错状况的地方,变成一个智力测验了.... 11/11 16:20
2F:推 theologe: 敢问老鱼与其他看官,apollumi跟apoleia的差异, 11/11 16:23
3F:→ theologe: 在於前者是annihilation(loss of being), 11/11 16:24
4F:→ theologe: 而後者不是annihilation吗? 11/11 16:24
5F:→ theologe: (可能也是英文阅读测验吧XD)11/11 16:27
这个问题需要搞这麽久吗?XD
有些人11/9当天就了解了,
有些人拖到现在还搞不清楚状况XD
本课的单字为以下三个:
.G622 apollumi 代表经文约3:16、太10:28
--大家都同意这边针对灵魂时指不得救/下地狱;
.G684 apoleia 代表经文太7:13--争议点;
.ekmedenisis(G1842的同源字?) annihilation
=complete loss of being.
=a place or state of nothingness
or unconscious existence.
--
老鱼再三引文强调G684「不是」annihilation,所以造成与G622的差异?
===============================
The idea of apoleia
is not that of annihilation but that which is ruined and
is no longer usable for its intended purpose. Apoleia does not describe the
complete loss of being, but the complete loss of well-being. It means utter
and hopeless loss of all that gives worth to existence. Note that contrary to
popular opinion apoleia does not refer to extinction or annihilation or an
end of existence, but to total ruin so far as the purpose of existence is
concerned.
===============================
A.第一大题(问neo,可是其他人也可答):
neo估狗到的
https://goo.gl/CQetEt
这个段落不是根本就把apollumi跟apoleia认为只是词性不同、意思混用了吗?XD
而老鱼、neo似乎都把annihilation当成基督教普遍的地狱观?
以下三个选项,请参考neo提供连结之引文,选出正确的:
1)neo是要否定引文,说apollumi不同於apoleia,是annihilation,故约3:16
"「 神爱世人,甚至将他的独生子赐给他们,
叫一切信他的,不致
灭亡(apollumi),反得永生。"
这边apollumi是指不得救=下地狱=annihilation,
而apoleia不是annihilation,
故太7:13不是指约3:16的不得救/下地狱。
2)还是neo要同意自己引的文,说apollumi/apoleia都不是annihilation,
导致约3:16
「 神爱世人,甚至将他的独生子赐给他们,叫一切信他的,不致灭亡,反得永生。
这边的「灭亡」也不指"不得救=下地狱=annihilation";
而neo这个资料前两页,是把annihilation、universalism,
与基督宗教「正统/普遍」的「地狱观」并列。
所以选项第三个:
3)apollumi/apoleia都不是annihilation,用在灵魂上时,
则都指向基督宗教非annihilation的地狱观。
B.第二大题:
而老鱼给的
http://www.preceptaustin.org/matthew_713-14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Destruction (684) (apoleia from apo = marker of separation, away from +
olethros = ruin, death but not annihilation) describes destruction,
in this
case the utter ruin or complete loss which is epitomized by eternal
punishment.
The idea of apoleia is not that of annihilation but that which is ruined and
is no longer usable for its intended purpose. Apoleia does not describe the
complete loss of being, but
the complete loss of well-being.
It means utter
and hopeless loss of all that gives worth to existence. Note that contrary to
popular opinion apoleia does not refer to extinction or annihilation or an
end of existence, but
to total ruin so far as the purpose of existence is
concerned.
The related root word apollumi is the term Jesus used to speak of those who
are thrown into hell
And do not fear those who kill the body, but are unable to kill the soul; but
rather fear Him who
is able to destroy [apollumi] both soul and body in hell.
(Mt 10:28)
As Jesus makes clear elsewhere,
hell is not a place or state of nothingness
or unconscious existence, as is the Hindu Nirvana.
It is the place of
everlasting torment, the place of eternal death, where there will be “
weeping and gnashing of teeth” forever (see Mt 13:42, 50).
All people are created by God for His glory, but when they refuse to come to
Him
"through the narrow gate" for salvation, they lose their opportunity for
eternal redemption and ultimately the opportunity of becoming what God
intended for them to be in Christ. At that time, they are fit only for
condemnation and destruction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
请问这边的意思是:
针对灵魂时,
1)apollumi=annihilation, apoleia≠annihilation
2)apollumi=annihilation, apoleia=annihilation
3)apollumi≠annihilation, apoleia≠annihilation; apollumi=apoleia
4)apollumi≠annihilation, apoleia≠annihilation; apollumi≠apoleia
附加题:
若选4),而apollumi、apoleia的差异又不在於是不是annihilation,
那到底差别在哪边?--程度之别:complete?eternal?
上面老鱼引的这段,apoleia没有指称complete、eternal吗?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
之前的相关讨论,整理在一起:
#1Q1R3AP2
6F:推 theologe: 我们现在讨论的议题是:窄门、哀哭切齿等等福音书的讲11/11 06:27
7F:→ theologe: 论,是在讲得救问题,还是得胜问题。有一个争点是太7:111/11 06:28
8F:→ theologe: 3的「灭亡/毁坏」是指通往地狱/不得救,还是只是不得胜 11/11 06:28
9F:→ theologe: 而要得救(通往千年国补习班)。老鱼说要帮大家解决这 11/11 06:28
10F:→ theologe: 个问题,就是#1Q0x7qzE ,但不知道为何老鱼引用的资料11/11 06:28
11F:→ theologe: 是支持"灭亡/毁坏是指通往地狱/不得救",就是老鱼倒戈11/11 06:28
12F:→ theologe: 的状况,而且他似乎没有发觉。11/11 06:28
#1Q1dnM_y
13F:→ theologe: 字典当然不能完全解决问题,重点是老鱼引的字典都是认为 11/11 13:00
14F:→ theologe: 太7:13是在讲永远的惩罚。neo一直看错重点。 11/11 13:01
15F:→ theologe: 现在问题是,老鱼为什麽引支持我方的根据,来说支持另一 11/11 13:02
16F:→ theologe: 方呢?这才是令人匪夷所思的点。 11/11 13:02
17F:→ theologe: destruction 信望爱也翻毁「灭」;重点不是怎麽翻,而是 11/11 13:04
18F:→ theologe: 其意义内涵为何。 11/11 13:04
19F:→ theologe: complete loss of well-being 11/11 13:05
20F:→ theologe: which is epitomized by eternal punishment. 11/11 13:06
21F:推 theologe: 永死或火湖里的永恒惩罚,本来就跟annihilation没关系; 11/11 13:10
22F:→ theologe: 是没有annihilation却complete loss of well-being才是 11/11 13:10
23F:→ theologe: 这个惩罚可怕之处。老鱼搞错重点,你竟然看不出来?XD 11/11 13:11
--
それはそれ!!これはこれ!!!
忘记旁边,努力面前!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 106.104.46.98
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Christianity/M.1510396397.A.F90.html
24F:→ df31: 看见这贴,又开始闹肚子了! 11/11 18:38
25F:→ df31: 讲过N遍了,我才是真正为『因行为称义派』留後路的人。 11/11 18:40
26F:→ df31: 三尺吗?觉得他对焚化炉有中偏执型的喜好,就是喜欢把人 11/11 18:41
27F:→ df31: 往里面送。 11/11 18:41
老鱼需要先通过中文测验。
28F:→ df31: 我已经换了新花样了啦!嘻嘻~~~谁买你的旧货! 11/11 18:48
29F:→ df31: 你难道不知道,我向来就是引领潮流,激发人气的吗! 11/11 18:48
30F:→ df31: 秘密是:我会创新,你只会抄袭。这是你我根本性的差异所在。 11/11 18:49
31F:→ df31: 这次希腊文解经大赛,也是我开始的,不是吗? 11/11 18:49
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
应该是智力测验+英文阅读测验。
※ 编辑: theologe (106.104.46.98), 11/11/2017 18:58:26
32F:→ df31: 啊嘎嘎乌拉拉~~~继续叫,你总有一天会叫死我的!:) 11/11 19:09
33F:→ df31: 不过,我敢打赌,根据你的DNA,你一定会咬我下面的那贴的! 11/11 19:15
34F:→ df31: 嘻嘻~~~~我已经把你研究透了!不咬,估计你会那个的! 11/11 19:16
35F:→ sCHb68: 讨论就讨论,三尺就是喜欢贬低别人的逻辑以及中文。 11/11 20:47
36F:推 df31: 所以我说,他有咬人的dna。改不掉的。 11/11 20:49
37F:推 df31: 他故意扭曲原意,谁条他的挖的坑哦!反正,他的名誉已经破 11/11 20:50
38F:→ df31: 产了。 11/11 20:50
39F:→ jacklin2002: 会说『堂堂三尺士莱马赫』的人不知道需要什麽测验? 11/11 20:57
41F:推 neohippie: 我觉得重点是:基督徒应该携手因信称义 11/11 22:04
修改说明:太10:28,我原本写成约10:28。
※ 编辑: theologe (220.130.205.94), 11/14/2017 08:08:29