http://212.95.232.145/fapl/html_gb/news/2006/news_4137.html 切尔西私下药检违例 英足总独立纪律委员会〔下称纪委会〕裁定，切尔西两年多前私下替球员进行药 物测试，违反相关药检条例，判处罚款四万英镑。 英足总就此发表声明：“切尔西在2004年7月14日擅自替麾下几名球员进行药物 测试，现已被纪委会裁定触犯相关药检条例。”切尔西不服判决，随即提出上诉，更 重申该俱乐部致力打击禁药的立场。 这次禁药测试的结果，亦导致样本呈阳性反应的罗马尼亚前锋穆图被切尔西解雇 ，及後该球员亦因此而遭受禁赛处分。另边厢，英足总却反对俱乐部私自执行药物测 试，以防俱乐部预先卖走犯禁的球员，又或者协助该球员瞒天过海。 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.chelseafc.com/article.asp?hlid=413349 Chelsea hits out at FA over drugs test rap Thursday, Aug 31, 2006 Chelsea Football Club has issued the following statement after the club was found guilty of breaching Football Association rules for conducting private drug testing in relation to the Adrian Mutu case. The statement says: Chelsea Football Club is totally committed to the fight against drugs in football. While we accept there was a technical breach of the doping regulations in this case, we find it extraordinary that we have been found guilty of trying to undermine the drug testing system. Moreover, the level of fine is simply outrageous and totally unjustified and we will now consider an appeal. The Football Association would be better served using its resources to increasing the effectiveness of its random testing and applying the toughest penalties available in all drug related cases, rather than punishing those who act genuinely in the fight against drugs. The FA appears to be more interested in procedure than substance, wasting a huge amount of time and money on lawyers in a case that has taken two years to resolve. During this time hundreds of hours have been spent prosecuting a technicality when common sense should have been applied. Despite our efforts to find a sensible and speedy resolution, the issue became mired in a bureaucracy that makes a mockery of the claims that the organisation is modernising itself. Chelsea FC would never contravene any rules in order to cover-up drugs in sport. These rules are in place to punish those who seek to protect drug takers. Our stance in the Adrian Mutu case proves that our sole intention in conducting a private test was to protect football from a drug taker. Firstly, we had suspicions that this player was a regular user of a Class A drug and the FA random drug test procedures had failed to confirm this. Secondly, the player was not privately tested for performance enhancing drugs, only for recreational drugs. In the circumstances, the test on July 12, 2004 proved negative and an FA approved test was requested later that summer which was positive. The player's contract was then terminated and during the hearing into this failed test he also admitted to taking cocaine on at least seven occasions, vindicating our actions. Chelsea's position on drugs is very clear. We adopt a zero tolerance policy towards anybody who fails a drug test and then rejects the chance of help and rehabilitation when offered by the club. The FA statement said: At an Independent Disciplinary Commission hearing today, Chelsea FC were fined ￡40,000 and issued with a warning after a charge of breaching FA Rule E25 was found proved. Chelsea were charged in relation to the independent private drug testing the club conducted on some of its players on 12 July 2004. The Commission found that, in conducting such tests, the club had breached The FA's Doping Control Regulations. Chelsea had denied the charge and requested a personal hearing. Note: FA Rule E25 states that "A Participant shall comply with the provisions of any doping control regulations as shall be in force from time to time as determined by the Council." The definition of Participants under The FA's Rules includes clubs. -- “没有几人能像他一样在37岁就累计过百亿的财富，没有几个人能像他一样狡黠。” by 俄罗斯《真理报》记者谢尔盖 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.129.121.141