http://0rz.tw/3c45k Lebron James Dominates the Celtics in Crunch Time It wasn't the prettiest game to watch by any stretch of the imagination, but the Cavs and Celtics traded baskets for about 44 minutes before Lebron James took control of the game. 不管出自什麽想像，这都不是最好看的比赛，但是骑士队和 Celtics你来我往了大约44 分钟，直到LeBron James接管了比赛。 I watched the TNT after show after the game and they kept talking about the Celtics, what's wrong with the Celtics, how they can't win on the road, how they'll have problems against Detroit, etc... Kenny said the Celtics are a "front-running team", meaning they can only play with a big lead. Chuck said he felt that the Celtics are bad 1v1 defenders. Magic made the comment about the Celtics not knowing who their go to guy was. 我看了TNT的赛後讲评，他们一直在讨论Celtics， Celtics怎麽了，他们如何不能在客 场赢球，他们遇到底特律会有什麽问题等等。Kenny说Celtics是支「顺风球」球队，意 思是他们只会在大比数领先时打球。Chuck说他感觉Celtics是不好的一对一防守者。 Magic评论说Celtics不知道他们的go-to-guy。 Though they did mention Lebron, I think they were missing the main point. The sole reason why the Cavs won the game tonight was due to Lebron James. 7-for-20 isn't a good shooting night, but LBJ did have 13 assists and 6 rebounds. Most importantly, Lebron was a part of every single big play from the Cavs in the last 4 minutes. I like analyzing sequences so here is roughly between 4min to 1min: 虽然他们的确提到LeBron，我认为他们都错过了重点。骑士队今晚能赢球的唯一理由就 是LeBron James。投20中7不是个好表现，但是LBJ却有13次助攻6篮板。最重要地， LeBron是骑士队最後四分钟内每一个关键进球的其中一部分。我喜欢分析结果，这里是 最後四分钟到一分钟内大约发生的事。 3:16 73-79 LeBron James makes 25-foot three point jumper 2:55 75-79 Paul Pierce makes 13-foot two point shot 2:38 75-82 Daniel Gibson makes 25-foot three point jumper (LeBron James assists) 2:19 Paul Pierce misses 25-foot three point jumper (LeBron closes out) 2:18 Boston offensive rebound 2:15 Jumpball: Kevin Garnett vs. Joe Smith (Ray Allen gains possession) 2:06 Ray Allen misses 25-foot three point jumper 1:45 75-84 LeBron James makes two point shot 1:25 LeBron James blocks Paul Pierce's 9-foot jumper 1:09 75-86 Anderson Varejao makes 11-foot two point shot (LeBron James assists) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ2oe2OD4yw On-ball screen: The Cavs "crappy offense" as Chuck calls it, is deceivingly simple. Yet, when you have the NBA's best player, why make things complicated. On the 3-pointer, they run a simple ball-screen with Varejao. The Celtics don't switch and sag allowing him to take the outside shot, 持球掩护： 骑士队有”很糟的进攻”，这是 Chuck所言，这是令人误解的太简单了。毕竟，如果你 有NBA最好的球员，为什麽要把事情弄得很复杂。在一个三分球，他们用Varejao作一个 简单的持球掩护。Celtics没有交换人防守，退下让他能够投这球外线。 http://0rz.tw/12476 In the second clip, Joe Smith comes to set the ball screen. You'll see 3 Celtics, Posey, Garnett and Rondo (I think). Point is, that they don't really make a play on Lebron. You must not allow him to get to the rim, take a charge or wrap him up, 在第二个片段，Joe Smith上来作个持球掩护。你看到三个Celtics球员，Posey、Garnett 和Rondo (译注：我认为是Pierce)。重点是，他们不是真的能够挡住LeBron。你绝对不 能让他攻击篮框、被犯规、让他完成。 http://0rz.tw/7044R Chuck thinks the Celtics 1v1 defense is bad. I think they actually defended both plays as good as possible. I would've sagged to give Lebron the shot. On the dunk, that's just Lebron being Lebron. You could've fouled him, but that's easier said then done. Chuck认为Celtics的一对一防守不好。我认为他们在这两个play都已经尽可能地防守好 了。要是我也会退下给LeBron投那球。至於灌篮，那就是LeBron之於LeBron。你可以犯 他一规，但是这说的比作的简单。 In the end, I thought this game was decided by the fact that the Cavs have the best player on the floor. The Celtics do have a go-to-guy, it's Paul Pierce. But Lebron > Pierce. 最後，我认为这场比赛最後决定的事实就是，骑士队有场上的最佳球员。 Celtics的确 有个go-to-guy，他就是Pierce。但是Lebron＞Pierce。 Summary: I've coached both football and basketball in my life. In football, you can have a star RB but you need an O-line to block for him. You can have a star QB, but you need athletes that can catch. You can have a devastating LB or rush end, but the offense can always run to the other side. 我当过美式足球和篮球的教练。在美式足球，你可以有个明星跑锋，但是你需要一个O- line替他挡人。你可以有个明星四分卫，但是你需要一个运动员可以接球。你可以有个 毁灭性的线卫或边锋，但是进攻总是可以从另一边。 Basketball differs in that I think 1 superstar player and 4 average players can actually be better than 5 good players. My traditional thinking has been I would prefer 5 good players over 1 superstar + 4 average. But, if that 1 superstar was a special player like Lebron, maybe that is better... 篮球不一样在於，我认为一个超级明星跟四个一般球员，可以真的比五个很好的球员好 。我的传统想法是我比较喜欢五个很好的球员，而不是一个超级明星加四个一般球员。 但是，如果那个超级明星是像LeBron那样特别的球员，也许那会比较好…… --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.166.206.181