作者falstaff (no day but today)
看板Catholic
标题Re: [建议] 圣经反同性恋吗?
时间Fri Aug 10 08:29:26 2007
※ 引述《opoj (oㄗo丁)》之铭言:
:
: ※ 引述《megchiu (fairy)》之铭言:
: : 最近在网路上看了一个对「当我们假在一起」电影评论的文章,
: : (http://www.wretch.cc/blog/SnoopyYang&article_id=22474487)
: : 上面说根据圣经,同性恋是可憎的事,行这事的人将被神弃绝,
: : ....
: : 可是有些美国的教会有些是同志教会,
: : 认为同性恋没有罪。
: : 请问真相到底如何?
:
: 圣经是反性行为,你去找所有圣经的经文,新旧约的
: 圣经反的是同性的性行为
: 不是反两人相爱
: --
:
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
: → opoj:对不起,最後一句收回,我忘记还有大卫和强纳森 08/09 12:23
: 推 doomwing:我蛮好奇天主教的解释是怎样? 08/09 18:33
同性恋的问题 会不会谈太多了
我们来看William Levada的做法
William Levada是天主教现任的教义部长
就是拉辛格当教宗之前的职位
他以前是旧金山教区的枢机主教
维基百科的说明
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Joseph_Levada
On 17 August 1995, Levada was appointed coadjutor archbishop of San
Francisco, and on 27 December of the same year he succeeded John Raphael
Quinn as the archbishop. Some of Levada's most famous actions as Archbishop
of San Francisco involved in the issues surrounding gay rights. In 1997, the
City of San Francisco passed a law that all companies must provide the same
benefits for domestic partners as for their spouses. Levada objected that
this violated Catholic teaching on the unique status of marriage, but the
city would not budge. Levada's solution was seen as a compromise in some
circles and a brilliant move in others: He ruled that unmarried employees of
the archdiocese could designate any person sharing the same address as their
beneficiary. This complied with the statute while avoiding a privileged
status for unmarried domestic partnerships. Levada also allowed a
predominantly gay and lesbian parish in the Castro district, Most Holy
Redeemer Church to remain active in the Archdiocese.
Levada最有名的就是在旧金山处理同性恋的议题
1997年 旧金山市通过一个法律
所有的公司需要提供跟配偶一样的待遇给同居的人(domestic partners)
Levada反对说 这违反天主教对婚姻的教导
可是旧金山市政府不退让
Levada就决定 旧金山教区没结婚的职员
随便一个人 只要跟职员用同一个地址 就可以享受配偶的福利
这避免有觉得天主教同意同居的人有特权的印象
Levada同时允许一个很有名的同志教堂 Most Holy Redeemer Church在旧金山市里
Addressing the issue of homosexual activity, Levada led a march of
approximately 1,000 people through the streets of San Francisco in April of
2005 to protest gay marriage. For his denunciation of same-sex marriage,
Levada has been criticized by LGBT associations. He wrote in 2004:
Heterosexual marriage, procreation and the nurturing of children form the
bedrock of the family, and the family unit lies at the heart of every
society. To extend the meaning of marriage beyond a union of a man and a
woman, their procreative capacity, and their establishment of family
represents a misguided understanding of marriage
有关同性恋的议题
Levada在2005 带领1000人 上街头 抗议同性恋婚姻
他在2004时 写的
家庭 就是一男一女组成的 有生育的功能
同性婚姻会 misguided婚姻的意义
=======
心得
在现在这麽讲人权的时代
最好不要有政治不正确的答案 像是同性恋是受诅咒之类的
而且 我也不觉得同性恋是受诅咒的
就算保守派的天主教 也说要尊重同性恋的人权
可是天主教不觉得同性婚姻是权力的一部分
那自由派的天主教 对同性恋就同意更多了
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 128.107.113.9
1F:推 doomwing:教廷内部也没有统一的答案吗? 08/10 13:00
2F:推 falstaff:这我就不知道了 可是教义部长的行为应该符合天主教教义吧 08/10 13:16
3F:推 doomwing:我的意思是.有没有为这个议题开过会议讨论之类的? 08/10 20:57
4F:推 opoj:我认为本文的第一篇原PO他要问的不是人的看法,而是圣经看法 08/11 00:54
5F:推 falstaff:没问题 我把标题改一下好了 08/11 01:22