作者paulik (The Rotten Age)
看板Cate
标题Re: 班杰明首场试映心得出炉
时间Wed Aug 13 08:01:56 2008
第二篇评论
点出了一些电影的问题,包括「重复」还有「闷」的问题
First review for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
If anyone can break the big-screen F. Scott Fitzgerald curse, it's David
Fincher. But did he really need three full hours to exorcise the Hollywood
demons of THE GREAT GATSBY, THE LAST TYCOON, TENDER IS THE NIGHT, THE LAST
TIME I SAW PARIS (and the author's alcohol-hastened demise at the age of
forty-four)?
This is the only review we've received from last week's screening. It's
mostly positive, but it does find fault with Fincher's storytelling (third
act "repetition" was a significant problem for this reader). Since I know
there have been... discussions at Paramount over the length of BENJAMIN
BUTTON, I'd really like to get a few more opinions on this cut of the movie -
especially since some critics complained of the "repetition" in the third
acts of FIGHT CLUB and ZODIAC.
I scored a few tickets for an “UNTITLED” screening at Paramount Studios
while standing in line at the Tropic Thunder screening, which is beyond
hilarious. After a long wait in the burning sun, we were taken inside
Paramount Studios and seated in one of the nicest screening rooms I’ve ever
seen. Whatever the film was—I was just excited to watch something on their
screen. But I was not disappointed when we found out it was David Fincher’s
upcoming film, THE CURIIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON.
This will be spoiler free.
The film tells the story of Benjamin Barker (Brad Pitt) who is born an old
man and ages backwards. In the midst of his awkward and unexplainable body
changes, he falls in love with a fellow small-town girl by the name of Daisy
(Cate Blanchett). The film tells the story of Benjamin’s entire life,
however, it mainly focuses on him and Daisy, who are slowly but surely aging
in opposite directions. Based on F. Scott Fitzgerald’s short story of the
same name.
First off, this does not feel at all like a David Fincher film. I think
die-hard Fincher fans are going to be quite surprised. At its core, it’s a
very romantic film. He has certainly stepped out of his box and certainly out
of his usual realm of creativity. There were many moments in the film that
felt almost Tim Burton-eqsue.
The film starts out amazingly. The story itself won’t have any trouble
reeling people in because Fincher is a great storyteller and the source
material is top notch. However, I felt this film suffers from the same
mistake Zodiac suffered from: things fell apart toward the end. The film is
somewhere near three hours. By an hour and a half/forty five, the audience
was getting restless. I could hear them squirming in their seats in front and
behind me. The last hour is ultimately weighed down by a lot of repetition
that has to do with the romance between Pitt and Blanchett. The film is truly
great up until the final hour where things begin to feel muddled and
unnecessary.
I know that seems like a lot of negative feedback. However, trust me, there
is a great deal of excellence in the film. Claudio Miranda’s cinematography
paired with Alexandre Desplat’s beautiful score makes for some truly magical
moments. In fact, most of the film is filled with these kinds of moments. It
works more than it doesn’t work; it’s just the final hour that needs to be
tightened up, as well as some rough patches toward the middle. As far as
performances go, Pitt and Blanchett are very good, but there are some
definite dry moments.
The special effects and make-up in this film are truly amazing. Brad Pitt’s
descent into youth is never once unbelievable; it looks tremendously
authentic. The same goes for Blanchett’s aging process. The announcer said
the film’s effects weren’t quite finished yet, which is even more
impressive.
With all that said, the film is still in the very early stages of it’s life
considering it won’t be released until Christmas. Fincher and his team have
a lot of time to polish it up. I’m sure these test screenings will reveal
the film’s obvious missteps, because I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one
who felt this way. Beneath it’s sprawling three hours, a beautiful film
exists. I have faith that Fincher will find it.
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/37904
--
【2007】凯特布兰琪【要拿女主角】
~CATE BLANCHETT~
The Golden Age‧
I'm Not There
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.160.180.226
1F:推 tallhigh:我竟然有种不妙的感觉 XD 遥想伊莉莎白2一开始的影评 08/13 15:45
2F:→ tallhigh:也是不错的......千万不要倒啊 08/13 15:46
3F:推 craigga:阿姐俨然是倒片女王呜呜 08/14 00:08
4F:→ paulik:这片再倒就真的不像话 我大概了解文中「重复」的意思 08/14 08:08
5F:→ paulik:电影行进过程太多回述与重现 看剧本看到後来也是有点烦 08/14 08:08
6F:推 craigga:我剧本看不到四成也就懒得看了 08/14 19:53
8F:→ craigga:台湾上映日期:2008/12/19 中文片名:班杰明的奇幻情缘 08/14 19:56
9F:→ paulik:扣除魔戒跟演配角的大片 阿姐自己主演的完全没大卖过(悲) 08/15 07:55