作者Churning (Scienter)
看板CFAiafeFSA
标题Re: [问题]Ethical and Professional Standards
时间Wed Dec 2 13:33:38 2015
※ 引述《eqil ()》之铭言:
: 3.Mark Hannning, CFA, is writing a research report on a firm. Hanning's
: supervisor, Rob Jannsen, sees a draft which includes favorable earnings
: projections. A few days later, Hanning obtains additional data that
: causes him to revise the projections downward. Right before public
: distribution of this report, Hanning learns that Jannsen has substituted
: the earlier, more favorabl earnings projections into the report without
: Hannning's knowledge. Hanning should most appropriately:
: A. consult with internal counsel and insist that this matter be reported
: to the regulators immediately.
: B. insist that either the report be corrected, or his name be removed
: from the report
: C. permit publication of this report, but issue a follow-up report
: correcting the earnings projections.
: Ans: B
改动已经影响到预测结果,你必须反应
: 15.Jenny Pickler, a Level II CFA Candidate, writes an economic forecast
: containing several interset rate projections. Her firm's investment
: committee reviews Pickler's report and changes several of the interest
: rates Pickler ahd forecast. To comply with CFA Institute Standards,
: Pickler:
: A. does not need to take any further action.
: B. should ask that her name be removed from the report.
: C. must independently review the data supporting the investment committee's
: changes.
: Ans: A
经过了review,而也只是细微修改,没有说会影响结果,不必反应
这两个比较难区分
: ----------------------------------------------------------------
: 6. Jim Whitaker is a director of an investment banking firm that is issuing
: a secondary offering for a company. The issue is oversubscribed.
: According to the firm's written trade allocation proedures, an over-
: subscribed issue must be distribute on a prorated basis among all
: interested clients. One of these clients is Whitaker himself. This
: procedure for allocating an oversubscribed issue is:
: A. in violation of the Standards becuase most clients will be receiving
: fewer shares than requested.
: B. in violation of the Standards because Whitaker should not participate
: if the issue is oversubscribed.
: C. not in violation of the Standards because all clients are treated
: fairly.
: Ans: B
: 3. According to teh Code and Standards, members and candidate who are involved
: in distributed an initial public offering(IPO) of equity shares and wish to
: participate in the IPO:
: A. may participate unless the IPO is oversubscribed.
: B. may not participate because this creates a conflict of interest.
: C. must obtain pre-clearance from a supervisor before participating.
: Ans: A
这个我就不知道哪里有矛盾了?
根据III-B Fair Dealing,只要oversubscribe,就以客户优先,没员工的份。
: ------------------------------------------------------------------
: 8. Telling potential investors that a short-term U.S. Treasury fund conatins
: "guaranteed" securities:
: A. does not violate any Standards.
: B. violates the Standards by misreporesenting the securities in the fund.
: C. violates the Standards by failing to consider the suitability of the
: fund for potential investors.
: Ans: A
: 14. Judy Bulush is a CFA candidate and is recommending the purchase of a
: Mutual fund that invests solely in long-term US. Treasury bonds (T-bonds)
: to one of her clients. She states that, "Since the US. government
: guarantee payment of both the bond's principal and interest, risk of loss
: with this investment is virtually zero." Blush's actions violated:
: A. the Standards on misrepresentation.
: B. the Standards on coomunication with clients and prospective clients.
: C. none of the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct.
: Ans: A
这个我也不知道哪里矛盾。
第一题说的是基金的内容物有哪些股票,并不违反。
第二题,即便是T-bill也会有通膨跟信用风险,任何对return或risk的保证都违反I-C
: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
: 这三对问题,两两问题的情境叙述都很相似,但是答案却几乎是相反的。看完详解还是
: 不懂之间的差异,让人觉得两个相反的答案很矛盾,请板上的高手解答,感谢!!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 216.171.11.27
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/CFAiafeFSA/M.1449034419.A.E96.html
1F:推 eqil: 谢谢第二组和第三组的解释,第一组能否再说明仔细一点? 12/03 04:11
2F:→ eqil: 第一组这两题都有更改预测结果吧?如果判定第一题的情节比较 12/03 04:14
3F:→ eqil: 重大,而第二题属於细微的修改? 12/03 04:15
4F:→ eqil: 是因为第一题是针对某个股的分析,第二题是总经的分析吗? 12/03 04:18
5F:→ eqil: 如何 打错 12/03 04:18
6F:推 firzen007: 我的理解是第一题的更改出现两种不同结果,所以必须反 12/03 17:10
7F:→ firzen007: 应,第二题只是针对预测结果做调整,不影响原先的预测 12/03 17:10
8F:→ firzen007: 方向 12/03 17:10
9F:→ Churning: firzen说的就是我的概念 12/03 17:14