作者GuyPearce (GuyPearce)
看板Brewers
标题Re: [翻译] Five Questions- Milwaukee Brewers
时间Thu Apr 1 07:34:33 2010
※ 引述《broken543 (没多少时间好杀)》之铭言:
谢谢原po的翻译,有几个地方要稍微修正一下
: Five questions: Milwaukee Brewers
: by Jeff Sackmann
: March 18, 2010
: http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/five-questions-milwaukee-brewers5/
: From 90 wins to 80 in one season. Sure, Milwaukee fans are used to seeing the
: hometown team lose, but the 2008 Wild Card changed the expectation game.
: Plenty of things went right for the Brewers last year, but the starting
: rotation was so, so wrong.
: 一季之差,从90胜到落到了80胜。当然、酒人迷们已经习惯了球队低迷的
: 战绩,但是08年的外卡改变了大家的期待。上一季对酒人来说、很多事情
: 都做对了,但是先发轮值却是大错特错。
: Will the rotation be respectable?
: 今年的轮值圈会像样点吗?
: One thing is certain: It will be tough for the rotation to be worse than it
: was last year. Brewers starters had an ERA of 5.37 last year (last in the
: National League, 0.40 behind 15th-place Washington), and that's including a
: 3.73 ERA from Yovani Gallardo. We could look at some more advanced stats, but
: they all tell about the same story.
: 只有一件事可以肯定:那就是轮值要比去年还烂,是件不太可能的事。
: 酒人的先发们去年创下了ERA5.37的成绩(国联垫底,比倒数第二的国民还
: 高了0.4),而且其中算进了Gallardo的3.73。我们可以查一下进阶数据,
: 但是结论并不会有什麽差别。
: At least there are some new faces. Along with Gallardo, the top of the
: rotation will include free-agent lefties Randy Wolf and Doug Davis. Between
: them, CHONE predicts that the Crew will get about 330 innings of sub-4.50
: pitching. Compared to replacement level, Wolf was a bit pricey. Compared to
: the disaster that was 2009 Brewers starting pitching, Wolf is a savior.
: 至少现在补进了新面孔。随着Gallardo,轮值圈顶端有了FA左投Rndy Wolf
: 跟Doug Davis。CHONE预测这三人大概可以贡献330局、4.50左右的成绩。
两人 以下
: 以替换层面来看,Wolf还真有点贵。但跟去年酒人先发的灾难来比较,Wolf
跟replacement
level相比
: 是个救世主。
: Also reassuring is that Dave Bush and Manny Parra have track records
: suggesting they are capable hurlers. Both rode a wave of poor performance and
: worse luck to ERAs above 6.00 last year; CHONE projects that both will come
: in under 5.00 in 2010.
: 同样让人放心的还有Dave Bush和Manny Parra,他们过去的纪录说明
: 他们也是有能力的投手。去年双双因为表现差劲和歹运缴出高於6.00
: 的ERA。CHONE预测他们今年都会降到5.00以下。
: Then there's Jeff Suppan. In a logical world, the Brewers would cut him
: loose, suffer the emotional pain of a $12 million sunk cost, and give his
: innings to someone—anyone—else. In this world, he may well end up with a
: rotation spot. He will give up a lot of runs.
: 然後是Jeff Suppan。理论上来说,酒人应该要释出他、硬吃下12M薪水
: 和情绪上的伤痛,然後把他的登板机会给别人─随便一个都可以。但实
: 际上,他可能会好好待在轮值圈内,然後丢掉一堆自责分。
: Even if Suppan sticks in the rotation for most of the season, this is a
: much-improved rotation. It doesn't look like a playoff-caliber one, but if
: Parra (still only 27) puts things together and rebounds to something like his
: 2008 season, it might be good enough to get the job done.
: 就算这季硬把Suppan留在轮值圈内,这轮值还是已经大大改善了。虽然
: 看起来不像是有季後赛能力,但如果Parra可以重拾他08年的状态,在
这
: 季後赛生存也是有可能的。
个阵容还是有机会进季後赛。
: They can field, they can run, but can they hit?
: 他们可以守、可以跑、但是他们能打吗?
: If you're looking for reasons to watch the Brewers this year, here are two:
: Alcides Escobar and Carlos Gomez. Both are among the most gifted defensive
: players in the game, and they'll be manning shortstop and center field for
: Milwaukee.
: 如果你在找今年看酒人的理由,这里有两个:Alcides Escobar和Carlos
: Gomez。两个都是极有天赋的防守球员,将会是带来惊奇的游击手和中外
将会为Milwaukee把守游击和中
: 野手。
外野
: But both also are young and come with question marks on their offense. Gomez
: has over 1,000 major league at-bats under his belt, with a sub-.300 on-base
: percentage to show for it. Brewers coaches are already tinkering with his
: approach, and he's a candidate (along with Escobar) to bat ninth, behind the
: pitcher.
: 但是他们两个都还年轻、并且在进攻上让人存疑。Gomez已经在大联盟累积
: 了超过1000棒次的机会,留下了差不多.300的上垒率。酒人教练团已经因为
低於 在稍
: 他在东补西补,并且有机会让他打第九棒、排在投手後面。
微调整他的击
球方式
: Officially, the Brewers aren't expecting much from the pair, but if both
: perform at the lower end of their offensive projections, it's easy to see an
: anemic overall offense result. For all that Ryan Braun and Prince Fielder can
: do, another down year from Corey Hart, a step back from Casey McGehee, and a
: couple of all-field youngsters could guarantee some awfully easy innings for
: opposing pitchers.
: 官方上、酒人并不对他们抱有有什麽太大的期待。但如果两个都缴出期望
: 值底端的成绩,贫血的整体进攻是很有可能的。Braun跟Fielder做他们能
: 做的、Hart又让人发闷的一年、McGehee的退步,再加上一两个年轻工具人
几个只会防守其它
都不会的年轻人
: 可以保证让对手投手很好过。
: Fortunately, there is hope. Escobar got on base at a .350 clip in Triple-A
: last year, and even batted .300 in his stint in the majors. He's shown solid
: gap power throughout his minor league career, knocking at least 25 doubles in
: each of the last two seasons.
: 还好,还有个希望。Escobar去年在3A缴出了.350的上垒率,连在大联盟期间
: 打击都有.300的表现。他的炮瓦已经展现了跟在小联盟生涯的明显差距,过
他在小联盟生涯已经展现了紮实的gap power(击出二垒
打三垒打所需的power)
: 去两季最少都有25支二垒安打。
: Gomez is a bigger question mark, but he might be the one with more potential
: at the plate. While he has never had a sterling offensive season, he held his
: own in the minors at a very young age; he just hasn't seen much in the way of
: improvement in the last two years.
: Gomez是让人比较存疑,但他还是有潜力。过去从来没有在大联盟有个完整球
虽然他过去在进攻上没什麽惊人的
: 季过,因为他的早期生涯都是在小联盟浮浮沉沉,只是过去两年他看来没什麽
表现,但是他年纪轻轻就进了小联盟,还能够维
持一定的水准(意思就是他在小联盟时面对的都
是年纪比他大比他有经验的对手,但还是有不错
的表现,代表他有一定的潜力在)
: 长进就是。
: Will Rickie Weeks stay healthy?
: Rickie Weeks可以保持健康吗?
: Probably not.
: 大概不会
: Has Doug Melvin fixed the bullpen yet?
: Doug Melvin已经把牛棚补好了吗?
: Little-known fact outside of Milwaukee: The bullpen wasn't that bad last
: year. The memory of the 2008 Eric Gagne edition is strong, but finally fading.
: 有点可能很多人不知道,事实上去年的牛棚并不是很差。08年Gagne留下
: 的印象很深,但它终於淡去了。
: Melvin has finally started to figure out how to build a bullpen with a decent
: payroll. Years ago, he was famous for his scrap heap pickups: Dan Kolb (when
: he was good), Derrick Turnbow (when he was good), Brian Shouse, and many
: more. Once he had some money to play with, he spent it on the likes of Gagne,
: Guillermo Mota, and David Riske.
: Melvin终於开始尝试去花大钱重组牛棚。过去几年,他以他的资源回收
终於开始了解要怎麽样花钱建构
牛棚(过去都是用自家产的免钱
的)
: 步数闻名:Dan Kolb、Derrick Turnbow、Brian Shouse还有其他一堆。
: 只要他手头上有钱可以烧,他就花在像Gagne、Mota、Riske这种投资上。
: Nobody ever said it was easy to build an effective bullpen. This year's
: edition is a relatively salary-efficient blend of proven vets (Trevor
: Hoffman, LaTroy Hawkins), experienced but affordable middle relievers (Todd
: Coffey, Claudio Vargas), and some homegrown pieces (Mitch Stetter, Carlos
: Villanueva).
: 没人说组一个有能力的牛棚很简单。今年的组成看来跟薪水相比很有价值:
: 已证明身价的Hoffman、Hawkins;有经验但还可负担的中继Coffey、Vargas
: ;还有几个自家采收的Stetter、Villanueva。
: A better performance from the starting rotation will help, and Hawkins should
: more than make up for the loss of Mark DiFelice. Hawkins' presence also would
: make it easier to weather injury or ineffectiveness from the 42-year-old
: Hoffman. This isn't a world-beating bullpen, but it isn't likely to hold the
: rest of the team back.
: 先发轮值的进步可以帮忙,加上Hawkins有着比弥补DiFelice的离去更多
: 的价值。Hawkins的存在可以分担Hoffman的年迈和衰退问题。这不是个
这不是个
: 有宰制能力的牛棚,但是至少可以阻止其他队。
强力的牛棚,但也不太可能会拖累这支球队。
: Where will Prince Fielder end up, and when?
: 小王子会何去何从,在何时?
: Those annoyed by the constant low-level chatter about a long-term deal for
: Prince Fielder had better brace themselves. It ain't going away anytime soon.
: 那些一直喋喋不休要给小王子一份长约的人最好可以闭嘴了,这短期内
一直有关於小王子长约的消息,那些对这些消息感到困扰的人最好想办
: 不会发生。
法自行解决,因为短期内会一直有这样的消息。
: A quick recap. Prince is now in his second season of arbitration. Last year,
: he signed a two-year deal that gave the club some cost certainty; this year,
: he's making $10.5 million. If Scott Boras and the Brewers settle on a
: one-year contract next year, we could be looking at something in Ryan Howard
: territory, pushing $20 million.
: 一个简单的概括。小王子现在身处仲裁的第二年。去年他签了一两年约
: ,这让球队的支出有了点肯定性(是说方便计划啦);今年、他的薪水是
: 10.5M。如果酒人跟Boras今年再签下一纸合约,我们可以期待看到差不
: 多是Ryan Howard等级,逼近20M。
: It's conceivable that Milwaukee would do that. Between the low-cost Ryan
: Braun deal and Suppan's contract coming off the books, the money will be
: available. It's even possible that the Brewers could convince themselves that
: Fielder is worth a $150 million, seven-year megadeal.
: 一般相信Milwaukee会签下去。有着俗又大碗的Braun加上摆脱Suppan,
: 资金是会够的。酒人甚至可以说服他们自己签下一份7y/150M的超值餐。
酒人甚至可能会说服他们自己:给小王子7年150M的大约
是值得的
: But this seems unlikely. First of all, Boras will want Fielder to test the
: rose-tinted waters of free agency. That probably rules out a long-term deal
: next winter. Second, while Fielder has shown some improvement at first base
: (-23 in 2006-07 to -7 in 2008-09, according to TotalZone), he's still a
: designated hitter in the not-too-distant future. The Brewers don't need one
: of those.
: 但这看来不太可能发生。第一、Boras会要小王子去诱人的FA试试水温。
: 这大概会把长约的可能性排除掉。第二、虽然他在一垒的进步是有目共睹
: (根据TotalZone,从06-07年的-23降到08-09年的-7),他在不远的将来还
: 是会变成个指定打击。酒人不需要这种角色。
: Here's what's going to happen. Unless the Brewers are in the hunt come July,
: Fielder will be unofficially available almost continuously until Opening Day
: next year. Doug Melvin will never publicly put him on the trading block, and
: he'll never back himself into a situation where he "must" trade his star.
: There won't be a Halladay-esque public bidding war, either. But he'll listen.
: 事情大概会是这样。除非酒人七月就把他收了,要不然小王子到明年开季
: 前都一直会是可交易的。Melvin绝对不会公开把他放上交易名单,他不会
: 做出让自己看起来逼不得已要交易掉球星的举。所以不会有像Halladay那
: 样的出价大战,但他会看你拿什麽来换。
: The Milwaukee front office isn't stupid. The odds that Fielder is wearing a
: Cerveceros uniform in 2012 are awfully low. Fielder can net a whole lot more
: than draft picks, and especially if the 2011 squad is shaping up to be
: another 80-win mediocrity, there's no reason to pay Fielder $20 million to be
: there. He might be part of a playoff run in 2010 or 2011, but it remains to
: be seen whether it's the Brewers he'll be leading into October.
: Milwaukee的制服组不是白痴。小王子到2012还穿着酒鬼球衣的可能性非常
: 地低。他可以换到的东西比选秀权更有价值,尤其是如果11年又会是个80
: 胜的鸡排球季,更没有理由用20M把他留下来。他可能会在10年或11年的季
在2010年或2011年,他可能
: 後赛阵容内,但这都得看酒人能不能打到10月。
还是会在酒人争夺季後赛的阵容当中,但到了10月季後赛时,他带领的球队
会不会是酒人就很难说了。(意思就是如果酒人季後赛无望,他就有可能被
交易到其他有机会进季後赛的球队)
: Bonus: Will Ryan Braun be designing T-shirts in October?
: Braun可以在10月设计T-shirt吗?
: This is one question on which all of us—Brewers fans, Brewers haters, and
: Brewers neutrals—can agree.
: 这是个我们全部─酒人迷、酒人敌、随便一个人都会同意的回答
: Please, please no.
: 绝对不要
: (请看原文、有附图)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.217.49
1F:推 broken543:谢啦,有三四处我自己也没把握有没有翻对 04/01 07:54
2F:→ adu:推 04/01 10:11