A new compound is isolated from mitochondria and a claim is made that it represents a previously unrecognized carrier in the electron transfer chain, and it is given the name coenzyme Z. Which line of evidence do you feel is the least conclusive in assinging this compound a position in the electron transfer chain!? A. When added to a mitochondrial suspension, coenzyme Z very rapidly and specifically is taken up by the mitochondria. B. Removal of coenzyme Z from the mitochondria results in a decreased rate of oxygen consumption. C. Alternate oxidation and reduction of the mitochondrion-bound coenzyme Z can be readily demonstrated D. The rate of oxidation and reduction of mitochondrion-bound coenzyme is of the same order of magnitude as the overall rte of electron transfer in mitochondria as measured by oxygen consumption. 为什麽答案是A呢!!?? 我怎麽觉得D比较接近 请强者帮我解答^^ -- 我是小龟 小龟是我 │ ││ ││ │ │ ││ ││ │ ˙ ˙ ˙ ˙ ˙ ˙ │ ││ ││ │ └───┘└───┘└───┘ -- ╭──── Origin:<不良牛牧场> bbs.badcow.com.tw (210.200.247.200)─────╮ │ ↘ Welcome to SimFarm BBS -- From : [220.141.156.139] │ ╰◣◣◢ ◢◢《不良牛免费拨接→电话:40586000→帐号:zoo→密码:zoo》 ◣◣◢ ─╯