中职错误引用与解读优质先发　引发争议 富邦悍将洋投索沙昨天在新庄对Lamigo桃猿投出8局失4分的内容，中职官方纪录系统 认定是一场「优质先发」(Quality Start，简称QS)，与一般认定的「先发至少6局且 责失在3以内」的定义不同，引发争议。 中职在昨晚赛後纪录简报中，先是标出索沙中断连6场QS，但经Lamigo TV主播徐展元 求证後，中职更正纪录，认定索沙昨天完成「优质先发」，且开季连7场持续中。 徐展元也贴出中职回应的「原文出处」做佐证，但经过查证，这段原文并非是「优质 先发」的定义，而是一段关於优质先发正反两面的讨论，其中反面的看法认为QS的门 槛非常不优，而且局数定得很死，不能调整，标准应该要订得更高才对，像是5局失2 分、6局失2分、7局失3分、8局失3分或9局失4分等等。 但这段原文并非是大联盟官方对於QS正式义，就只是一篇讨论(完整原文列在新闻最下 方)，真正大联盟官网的QS定义应是， 连结：正确的大联盟官网「优质先发」定义 Definition(定义) A starting pitcher records a quality start when he pitches at least six innings and allows three earned runs or fewer. (先发投手的优质先发纪录必须 是至少投6局，且责失分必须是3分或更少) 大联盟官方认定的QS定义，从1985年《费城询问报》记者洛伊(John Lowe)创造这个词 以来从来都没有变过，洛伊後来为《底特律自由报》工作，倪福德在2009年於老虎上 大联盟时，曾受到这位资深大联盟记者的关注。 而多年来，美媒各界对於QS的认定或质疑一直都有，历史名投莱恩(Nolan Ryan)甚至 曾提出「高优质先发」(High Quality Start)一词，但目前最普遍使用的还是洛伊创 造的QS。 QS的定义只有2个条件，一是先发至少6局，二是责失最多3分，从来没有更改过。曾有 过是否改条件的讨论，认为超过6局的单场防御率在4.5以内，是否也可认定为「优质 先发」，如此一来，8局失4分、9局失4分都在标准内。 但无论是大联盟官网、维基百科，还是棒球权威统计网站「Baseball Reference」， 所有关於QS的定义仍是「先发至少6局且责失在3以内」，并没有改变。 中职针对「优质先发」定义，给徐展元的原文引用出错，并且发生解释谬误，已引发 网友争议，出现中职认定QS独步全球的笑话，而中职所有针对「优质先发」的统计数 据，全都出错。 以下是中职针对「优质先发」，给徐展元的原本「出处」， Quality Starts Pros: The reasons to use quality starts are easier to quantify and easier for me to talk about, since I prefer the category myself. First and foremost, quality starts are entirely dependent on the starting pitcher (and his defense) and have no connection to his team's offense. The pitcher has significant control on whether he gets a quality start or not and it is a good evaluator of a pitcher's performance. More on this later. Like wins and strikeouts, they are a counting stat to balance out the two rate stats of ERA and WHIP. And while the minimum quality start of 6 innings with 3 earned runs is a poor 4.50 ERA, most quality starts actually have a much better ERA than that. Cons: That minimum requirement for a quality start is pretty bad. Furthermore, it is rigid and doesn't adjust with innings pitched. A better stat would require something like 5 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 6 innings with 2 ER or fewer, 7 innings with 3 ER or fewer, 8 innings with 3 ER or fewer, and 9 innings with 4 ER or fewer. Currently, a pitcher would not get a quality start for pitching 5 perfect innings and getting pulled, or even pitching nine innings with 4 ER, even though that is better than the 4.5 ERA you get in the basic QS. Thus, managers with a quick hook become an issue. Tampa Bay last season is a great example, as their club philosophy was to pull starters before seeing the other lineup a third or fourth time, usually in the fifth inning. This was painful as a Nate Karns owner in a deep league with QS. He would pitch well for five innings and then be pulled. Another issue is that relievers can ruin a quality start. I can't count how many times my starter left in the seventh after allowing three or fewer runs and then a reliever comes on and allows inherited runners to score, blowing the quality start. (谢岱颖／综合报导) https://tw.sports.appledaily.com/realtime/20190501/1559846/ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 111.253.13.223 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/BaseballNEWS/M.1556730711.A.D88.html