Which 1B are best at receiving throws? New data has the answer 哪一位一垒手最擅长接传球？statcast全新数据给出了答案。 Most catches are routine, but who excels on the toughest plays? 大多数接球都很常态，但谁能在最艰难的防守中脱颖而出？ August 19th, 2026 Mike Petriello https://www.mlb.com/news/breaking-down-first-base-throw-receiving-data **文长，图片网址为MLB原文连结-需用网页全版开图。 https://www.mlb.com/video/alec-burleson-s-strongest-scoops-of-2026 Through the first four-plus months of this season, St. Louis first baseman Alec Burleson has recorded nearly 1,000 putouts. That sounds like a lot of work, and it is; it’s the largest figure of any player in the Majors in 2026. That number, however, encompasses two very different parts of his job. 在这个赛季的前四个多月中，圣路易红雀的一垒手 Alec Burleson 已经记录了将近 1,000 次刺杀（putouts）。这听起来是一项繁重的工作，事实也确实如此；这是 2026 年大联 盟（Majors）所有球员中最高的数字。然而，这个数字包含了他工作中截然不同的两个部 分。 Approximately 25% of that total is fielding batted balls, at which Burleson, who had spent much of his time in the outfield in his previous three seasons before becoming St. Louis’ primary first baseman in 2026, has been a work-in-progress. His minus-4 Outs Above Average this year is adequate, but mildly below average. 在总数中，大约有 25% 是处理击出球的防守，而在 2026 年成为圣路易红雀的主力一垒手 之前，Alec Burleson 在过去三个赛季的绝大部分时间都在外野度过，因此这项技术仍在 持续改进中。他今年 -4 的出局数超越预期值（Outs Above Average / OAA）算尚可，但 略低於平均水准。 The remaining 75% of those putouts, then, are about a first baseman’s other big responsibility – catching throws from his infield mates. Given the massive difference in opportunities, that would seem to be a far more important skill, yet even that has a necessary breakdown within it. Some large portions of that figure, one would assume, are fairly typical on-the-money throws that any semi-competent professional first sacker would be able to receive easily. 因此，剩余 75% 的刺杀则关乎一垒手的另一个重大职责──接来自内野队友的传球。考虑 到机会次数的巨大差距，这似乎是一项重要得多的技能，但即使是这项技能，内部也有必 要进行细分。可以设想，这个数字中的很大一部分是相当典型的精准传球，任何稍微合格 的职业一垒手（first sacker）都能轻松接住。 We haven’t really known, though. This aspect of a first baseman’s life has been a blind spot in public Statcast data, and while other sites do publish some information about ‘scoops,’ that’s only the number of successful ones, and even then that’s only a small portion of the throws a first baseman has to haul in, despite the outsized importance they receive. 不过，我们过去其实并不真正了解。一垒手生涯的这一维度过去一直是公开 Statcast 数 据中的盲点，虽然其他网站确实会发布一些关於「捞球/挖地瓜接球」（scoops）的资讯， 但那仅仅是成功接球的次数，而且即便如此，尽管这些传球备受关注，也仅占一垒手必须 接住的传球中的一小部分。 That, then, is the point of the latest Statcast metric at Baseball Savant, which evaluates the performance of a first baseman at receiving the ball. It’ s about scoops, sure, but it’s a lot more than that. It’s about the hundreds of throws a first baseman has to handle, and it’s about realizing which one of them actually means much of anything. 这正是 Baseball Savant 最新 Statcast 数据指标的核心所在，该指标旨在评估一垒手在 接球方面的表现。当然，这与捞球（scoops）有关，但远不止於此。这关乎一垒手必须处 理的数百次传球，并且关乎厘清其中哪些传球才真正具有重大意义。 The way this works is like most other Statcast metrics, which is to say that it’s not just, “Did you make the play?” but also “... and how difficult was that opportunity expected to be?” In the same way that a sinking liner in the gap is much harder for an outfielder than a lazy can-of-corn pop fly, a throw you have to catch on a short hop or well wide of the bag shouldn’t be considered the same as an on-target no-brainer. 这项指标的运作方式与大多数其他 Statcast 指标类似，也就是说，它不仅仅衡量「你是 否完成了防守？」，还衡量「……该次防守机会预计的难度有多高？」。就像外野手处理 外野两侧空档的平飞下沉球比处理轻松的冲天炮高飞球（can-of-corn pop fly）要困难得 多一样，你必须靠弹跳接球（short hop）或偏离垒包很远才能接到的传球，不应被视为与 精准无虞的传球同等对待。 Put those expectations on every play, accumulated over the course of the season, and you’ll find out that the best receiving first baseman this year is Burleson, who has added +6 Outs Above Average simply via being good at collecting throws from JJ Wetherholt, Masyn Wynn, Blaze Jordan, and all the rest. 将这些预期值应用到每一次防守中，并在整个赛季中累积，你会发现今年接传球表现最出 色的一垒手是 Alec Burleson，他仅凭藉擅长接住来自 JJ Wetherholt、Masyn Wynn、 Blaze Jordan 以及其他所有队友的传球，就贡献了 +6 的出局数超越预期值（Outs Above Average / OAA）。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/v1787145626/mlb/wm0nynsl8bodwrofcipq.jpg (Alec Burleson has compiled the most value in 2026 via receiving throws from infielders.) （Alec Burleson 在 2026 年透过接内野手传球创造了最高的价值。） This data is available going back to 2021, and there's a pair of extremely satisfying names atop that cumulative list. 这项数据可以追溯到 2021 年，而在这份累积排行榜的顶端，出现了一对非常令人信服的 名字。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/cblueqrqpebudhtknmct.jpg (Freddie Freeman narrowly edges out Matt Olson atop the 1B receiving value board since 2021.) （自 2021 年以来，Freddie Freeman 在一垒手接球价值榜上以微弱优势险胜 Matt Olson 占据榜首。） It’s true that Matt Olson and Freddie Freeman have played the most games of any first basemen since 2021. It’s also almost certainly true that when thinking about first basemen with the most shining defensive reputations over the last decade, you’d think of that pair nearly immediately. 确实，自 2021 年以来，Matt Olson 和 Freddie Freeman 是所有一垒手中出赛场次最多 的两位。同样几乎可以肯定的是，当你想到过去十年中防守声誉最顶尖的一垒手时，你几 乎会立刻想到这两个人。 So: How does this work? The method is explained in more detail by MLB.com Senior Data Architect Tom Tango here, but simply put: On each throw, the location of the throw is accounted for, as well as the speed and location of the batter running to first. Based on those inputs, we can see how often that opportunity gets turned into an out. (That last part is important, because if a runner is far away from first base, then a first baseman has more chance to recover and get back to the bag. It's not all about the throw.) 那麽，这项数据是如何运作的？MLB.com Senior Data Architect Tom Tango 在此处更 详细地解释了这种方法，但简单来说：每次传球时，都会考虑传球的位置，以及打者跑向 一垒的速度和位置。根据这些输入条件，我们可以算出该次防守机会转化为刺杀出局机率 。（最後这部分很重要，因为如果跑者距离一垒还很远，一垒手就有更多机会修正防守并 回到垒包，这并不完全取决於传球品质。） That’s all taken into account at the moment the first baseman can actually do anything about it, which is not the time the throw is unleashed, but the time that the ball reaches an eight-foot perimeter around the first base bag, which is roughly the stretching radius of an outstretched player. This is entirely about, “What does the first baseman do with the opportunity he gets near the bag?” 所有这些变数都会在一垒手真正能做出防守动作的那一刻被纳入计算──那不是球被传出 的瞬间，而是球抵达一垒垒包周围 8 英尺范围内的那一刻，这大约是一名球员伸手伸展所 能触及的半径。这完全关乎：「一垒手利用他在垒包附近获得的机会做了什麽？」 For Burleson, those hundreds and hundreds of throws look like this: 对 Alec Burleson 来说，那数以百计的接球机会看起来就像这样： https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/fzlphpmg1an8xtfemccr.jpg (Every throw Burleson has seen in 2026, from top-down and left-side infielder views.) （Alec Burleson 在 2026 年面对的每一次传球，分别从俯瞰与左侧内野手视角呈现。） In Burleson’s case, more than 80% of those throw chances have indeed been those on-target, on-the-money ones, the kind like this that you’d generally never pay attention to. He’s had 420 on-target chances, and 414 of those have turned into outs. That's nearly 99%, but it collects him all of +2 OAA for all of that effort. 以 Alec Burleson 为例，超过 80% 的传球机会确实是那些到位且精准的传球，也就是你 通常根本不会去注意到的那种。他获得了 420 次精准传球的机会，其中 414 次成功转化 为刺杀出局。这几乎达到了 99%，但所有这些努力仅为他累积了 +2 的出局数超越预期值 （Outs Above Average / OAA）。 If that doesn't seem like much, it shouldn't. After all, you’re endlessly doing things like this, fielding a lightly-tossed throw where the runner is more than 30 feet away from the base at the time it comes to you. It’s hard to compile that much value on doing that. 如果这看起来不多，那也是正常的。毕竟你只是日复一日地处理这类防守──处理一次轻 轻抛出的传球，当球到达你手中时，跑者距离垒包还有 30 多英尺远。光靠做这些事本来 就很难累积太多价值。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/izrve9hw8mscqmqgqqip.jpg The end result of that is a billion throws that look like this (which gain a first baseman +0.01 out, or basically nothing) … 其最终结果就是有无数次像这样的传球（这只会让一垒手获得 +0.01 次出局数，基本上等 於没有）…… https://www.mlb.com/video/jojo-romero-in-play-out-s-to-nick-fortes … and many fewer that look like this (in which Burleson earned nearly +0.25 an out, since other first basemen failed to convert this opportunity about a quarter of the time) ……以及少得多的像这样的传球（Alec Burleson 在这类防守中赚取了将近 +0.25 次出 局数，因为其他一垒手大约有四分之一的时间无法将这种机会转化为刺杀出局） https://www.mlb.com/video/dustin-may-in-play-out-s-to-sal-frelick If you go further and break down throws into high, low, wide, on-target, scoops, and bounces, you can get really granular about who does what. 如果你进一步将传球细分为高球、低球、偏球、精准传球、捞球/挖地瓜接球（scoops） 和弹跳球（bounces），你就能非常细致地分析谁擅长处理什麽样的球。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/airjc3g5ybpm1qpwmwop.jpg (The various categories a throw to first base can fall into.) （传向一垒的传球可能归类的各种范畴。） It turns out, Yuli Gurriel was the best at scoops and bounces dating back to 2021, and the long-limbed Freeman is the best at corralling both high and wide throws. For just 2026, it's Houston's Christian Walker who has the most scoops, at 10. Some of them look extremely smooth. 事实证明，追溯至 2021 年，Yuli Gurriel 最擅长处理捞球（scoops）和弹跳球（ bounces），而手长脚长的 Freddie Freeman 则最擅长抓下偏高和偏宽的传球。单看 2026 年，休士顿太空人的 Christian Walker 以 10 次成功捞球（scoops）位居榜首， 其中有些动作看起来极其流畅。 https://www.mlb.com/video/bryan-king-in-play-out-s-to-masataka-yoshida Thanks to that breakdown, we can bucket out every throw opportunity a first baseman has received since the start of this data in 2021, and you’ll see how few opportunities there really are for a first baseman to distinguish himself. 多亏了这项细分，我们可以把自 2021 年该数据开始统计以来，一垒手接到的每一次传球 机会进行归类，而你会看到一垒手真正能脱颖而出的机会其实有多少。 Where are the throws that a first baseman has to receive? 一垒手必须接住的传球落在哪里？ - On Target 82% （精准到位） - High 5%　（偏高） - Wide 5%　（偏宽） - Low 3%　（偏低） - Bounce 3%　（弹跳球） - Scoops 2%　（捞球/挖地瓜接球） Eight of 10 throws, in another words, should overwhelmingly become outs. (And they are: 98% of on-target throws become on-target outs. Only two-thirds of scoops do, but again scoops are much less frequent.) 换句话说，十次传球中有八次绝大多数都应该变成刺杀出局。（事实也确实如此：98% 的 精准传球都能顺利造成出局；而捞球（scoops）只有三分之二能造成出局，但捞球出现的 频率要低得多。） This is mostly why scoops, as exciting as they are, don’t carry as much value as you’d think – because they rarely ever happen. Pete Alonso has had the most scoop opportunities of any first baseman this year, for example, but even that is only 15, or fewer than once per week. (Remember that scoops and bounces are separated here, because they’re different kinds of plays.) 这主要就是为什麽捞球（scoops）虽然精彩，却没有你想像中那麽高价值的理由──因为 它们极少发生。以 Pete Alonso 为例，他今年拥有所有一垒手中最多的捞球（scoop）机 会，但即便如此也只有 15 次，平均每周还不到一次。（请记住，这里将捞球和弹跳球分 开计算，因为它们是不同类型的防守。） Burleson, in the midst of a breakout hitting season, spoke about how he approaches receiving throws in a video for Cardinals.com back in April. 正处於打击爆发赛季的 Alec Burleson，早在四月份接受 Cardinals.com 的影片采访时 ，就曾谈到他是如何看待和处理接传球这项工作的。 https://www.mlb.com/video/burly-talks-1b "It's an art,” Burleson told Jim Hayes. “You can say it's an art. [You need] soft hands for sure, and there's not any pick that's the same as the last. Depends on the runners, depends on who's throwing it, depends on where it's coming from in the infield. You just take as many reps as you can in practice." 「这是一门艺术，」Alec Burleson 告诉 Jim Hayes。「你绝对可以说这是一门艺术。你 肯定需要柔和的手感，而且没有一次接低弹跳球（pick）是跟上一次完全相同的。这取决 於跑者是谁、取决於传球者是谁，也取决於球是从内野的哪个位置传过来的。你只能在练 习中尽可能多做几次重复训练。」 “You're reading the throw,” he also added. “You know who is running, so you know how much time the infielder has, whether he's going to catch and go – or [if] he's going to have a little bit of time.” 「你得去判读那个传球，」他补充道。「你知道谁在跑垒，所以你知道内野手有多少时间 ，他是接到球就得立刻传出，还是他能有一点充裕的时间。」 Which is great, because that kind of context is basically exactly what the metric is looking for. 这太棒了，因为这种情境背景基本上正是这项数据指标所要寻找的。 Back in the first month of 2025, when Alonso was getting all sorts of praise for this skill, then-Mets manager Carlos Mendoza issued a very high compliment. "He’s probably the best in the game at it, to be honest with you, ” as told to Anthony DiComo. That, by this metric in 2024, was exactly right. He was the best at it -- though it hasn't quite sustained since. 回到 2025 年的第一个球季月份，当 Pete Alonso 因这项技能获得各种赞誉时，时任纽约 大都会总教练 Carlos Mendoza 在接受 Anthony DiComo 采访时给出了极高的评价：「老 实跟你说，他可能是这项技术全联盟最优秀的。」根据这项指标在 2024 年的统计，这完 全正确，他当时确实是表现最好的——尽管此後这种势头并未能完全维持下去。 Interestingly, while Burleson is in his first year as a full-time first baseman and is excelling, we find that on the other end of this are three defenders who arrived in the Majors at other positions. 有趣的是，虽然 Alec Burleson 处於他作为全职一垒手的第一年且表现优异，但我们发现 ，在这项指标的另一端，是三位登上大联盟时守其他位置的防守球员。 -8 Bryce Harper -7 Luis Arraez -7 Rafael Devers Arraez famously declared his intent to stay at second base this year, which has worked out for him; his 5’10” height, as you’ll shortly see, may have been working against him. Devers is barely more than a calendar year into his transition to first base. Luis Arraez 今年公开宣布希望留在二垒，这对他来说成效不错；如你很快就会看到的， 他 5 尺 10 寸的身高可能一直对他不利。而 Rafael Devers 转守一垒的时间也才刚满一 年多一点。 Harper, who famously moved from the outfield to first in 2023 (to initially good reviews) was having a down year on defense even before this was incorporated. While he's been fine at scoops, it's been more about the non-scooping aspect of this. Bryce Harper 在 2023 年从外野移至一垒（最初获得了不错的评价），但甚至在纳入这项 数据之前，他今年的防守表现就处於低迷状态。虽然他在处理捞球（scoops）方面表现尚 可，但更多问题出在非捞球的防守环节上。 A lot of it seems to be that he doesn't always hold the bag on throws that aren't perfectly made, like this: 这其中很大一部分原因似乎在於，面对传得不够完美的球时，他并不总是能踩住垒包，就 像这次一样： https://www.mlb.com/es/video/jesus-luzardo-in-play-no-out-to-otto-lopez-1rmw2c Sometimes, it’s just something weird, like the time earlier this year when he failed to corral a perfect throw because, apparently, the ball went right through his glove. Nothing we can do about that – the out wasn’t made, and he was indeed charged with an E3 – but it’s kind of a bad beat, too. 有时这纯粹是一些离奇的事情，比如今年早些时候，他未能接住一次精准的传球，原因显 然是球直接穿过了他的手套。对此我们无能为力──出局数没有拿到，他确实也被记了一 次一垒手失误（E3 / Error by First Baseman）──但这某种程度上也算是运气欠佳。 https://www.mlb.com/video/ball-slips-through-hole-in-bryce-harper-s-glove All this lets us ask some pretty fascinating questions, like these. 这一切让我们得以提出一些相当引人入胜的问题，例如以下这些。 Does being tall matter? 身高重要吗？ When the Phillies moved Harper to the outfield earlier this month, shortstop Trea Turner had some interesting thoughts about replacing the 6’1” Harper with the 6’4” Alec Bohm. 当费城费城人在本月早些时候将 Bryce Harper 移至外野时，游击手 Trea Turner 对於用 6 尺 4 寸的 Alec Bohm 取代 6 尺 1 寸的 Bryce Harper 发表了一些有趣的看法。 “(Bryce) picked the ball great for us this year, and he did a good job,” Turner said. “But sometimes a bigger target just makes you feel a little better. And then it feels like you make better throws just because you know you have so much room for error. Where there’s not like, ‘I have to throw this one perfect,’ or, ‘I have to do this.’ So, yeah. It can definitely help sometimes. Especially on high throws, too, where you’re like, ‘Oh, I kind of let that one go up a little bit.’ He can kind of stay on the base and stay on those.” 「（Bryce Harper）今年为我们接低弹跳球接得很好，做得不错，」Trea Turner 表示 。「但有时候一个更大的目标就是会让你感觉安心一些。然後你会觉得自己的传球品质 变好了，因为你知道自己有很大的容错空间。不会觉得『我这一球必须传得很完美』或 『我必须做到这样』。所以，是的，这有时确实会有帮助。特别是在传高球的时候，当 你心想『噢，我这一球好像传高了一点』时，他依然能够留在垒包上并接住那些球。」 The stats back that up. Harper was +1 on bounces and scoops, but -4 on high throws, the weakest first baseman in the Majors at that. 数据证实了这一点。Bryce Harper 在弹跳球（bounces）和捞球（scoops）上的表现是 +1，但在偏高传球上却是 -4，是大联盟在该项目上最弱的一垒手。 So, what about it? Does being tall help here? Overall, maybe a very little, but less than you'd think. We looked at the 30 first basemen who had 1,000 throw chances over the last six years, and it's only because of the presence of the 6’4” Freeman and Olson that makes this look like a trend at all. Without that pair, there's basically no relationship at all -- as shown by the relatively shorter Gurriel (6’0”), Josh Naylor (5’10”), and Walker (5 ’11”), who all rate well. 那麽，事实究竟如何？身材高大在这方面是否有帮助？总体而言，可能只有极小的影响， 但比你想像的要少。我们调查了过去六年中拥有 1,000 次接传球机会的 30 位一垒手，完 全是因为 6 尺 4 寸的 Freddie Freeman 和 Matt Olson 的存在，才让这看起来像是一种 趋势。如果没有这两个人，两者之间基本上没有任何相关性──相对较矮的 Yuli Gurriel （6 尺 0 寸）、Josh Naylor（5 尺 10 寸）和 Christian Walker（5 尺 11 寸）的评价 都很出色就证明了这一点。 Call this a loose relationship, but probably not a terribly strong one – you can be short and play a good first base. 可以说这是一种松散的关联，但可能不是很强烈的关联──即使身高较矮，你也一样能守 好一垒。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/oajv5aqxtyp7eesh1cm8.jpg (Data from 2021-2026.) But for high throws, shorter first baseman are at a more notable disadvantage. Of the top 10 fielders at getting high throws, only Michael Busch (5’11”) is shorter than six feet tall. Of the eight weakest at high throws, every single once is 6’1” or shorter. 不过对於偏高的传球，较矮的一垒手确实处於较为明显的劣势。在接偏高传球排名前 10 名的野手中，只有 Michael Busch（5 尺 11 寸）身高低於 6 尺。而在处理高球最弱的 8 名球员中，每一个人的身高都在 6 尺 1 寸或以下。 How to explain the disconnect, that tall first basemen are better at high throws, but not better overall? It might be that taller first basemen have a more difficult time on bounce throws, the ones that impact the grass more than 15 feet away. 如何解释这种落差──即身材高大的一垒手更擅长接高球，但整体表现并未更好？这可能 是因为身材高大的一垒手在处理弹跳传球时更为吃力，特别是那些落点距离垒包 15 尺以 外草皮上的弹跳球。 That knowledge, then, leads to some outcomes that might be confusing at first glance. 了解这一点後，就能解释一些乍看之下可能令人困惑的结果。 Last summer, Cincinnati shortstop Elly De La Cruz was charged, understandably, with an error on this high throw in Arizona. But first baseman Spencer Steer also eats some negative receiving value here, even if when you watch it, you think there was no way he could have come down with this. The reason why? We’re comparing first basemen not to themselves, but to all others, and at 5’9”, Steer had to leap for a ball that a taller first baseman might have caught easily. 去年夏天，辛辛那提红人游击手 Elly De La Cruz 在亚利桑那响尾蛇主场的这次偏高传球 被记了一次失误，这是可以理解的。但一垒手 Spencer Steer 在这次接球上也承担了一些 负面的接球价值，即使当你看比赛影片时，会觉得他根本不可能抓下这一球。原因何在？ 我们不是将一垒手与他们自己相比，而是与所有其他一垒手相比，身高 5 尺 9 寸的 Spencer Steer 必须跳起来接这一球，但身材更高大的一垒手本来可能轻松接住。 https://www.mlb.com/video/perdomo-reaches-on-a-high-throw-from-elly-de-la-cruz Height, in other words, is a skill here – one you have or you don’t. 换句话说，在这里身高也是一种天赋/技能──你要麽拥有，要麽没有。 Which infielders have been helped or hurt by first base receiving? 哪些内野手受到了受惠或受害於一垒手的接球表现？ While this isn’t a grading tool to evaluate throwing accuracy, you can, at least, see which fielders have been saved by good first basemen – or the opposite. 虽然这不是用来评估传球准确度的评分工具，但你至少可以看到哪些野手被优秀的一垒手 拯救过──或者反之亦然。 Over the six years of this metric, no infielder has been helped more by excellent first base receiving than Ozzie Albies (whose 1Bs earned +9 outs on his throws) which makes a great deal of sense; Albies has been throwing to Freeman and then Olson his entire career. 在这项数据指标统计的六年里，没有哪位内野手比 Ozzie Albies 从出色的一垒接球中获 益更多（一垒手们（1Bs / First Basemen）在他的传球基础上多拿到了 +9 次出局数）， 这非常符合常理；Ozzie Albies 整个职业生涯都在传球给 Freddie Freeman，随後是 Matt Olson。 On the other end, no infielder has been hurt more than De La Cruz, at -12 Receiving OAA, which also makes sense, as Cincinnati first basemen (mostly Steer, Sal Stewart, and Christian Encarnacion-Strand) have been tied for baseball’s weakest over De La Cruz’s four-season career. 在另一端，没有哪位内野手受害比 Elly De La Cruz 更深，接球出局数超越预期值（ Receiving OAA）为 -12，这同样合情合理，因为在 Elly De La Cruz 的四个赛季职业生 涯中，辛辛那提红人的一垒手群（主要是 Spencer Steer、Sal Stewart 和 Christian Encarnacion-Strand）并列全大联盟最弱。 How much does this matter? 这有多重要？ That’s the tricky part. As we said: 80% or so of throws a first baseman gets are the receiving equivalent of the can of corn. It's nearly impossible to separate yourself from others on those. That just doesn’t leave a lot of room for value, though that’s certainly not the same thing as not having value. This does have value. 这正是棘手之处。正如我们所说：一垒手接到的传球中，大约有 80% 在接球难度上相当於 轻松接取的冲天炮高飞球（can of corn）。你几乎不可能在这些球上拉开与其他人的差距 。这使得该项技术没有太多的价值累积空间，尽管这并不意味着它没有价值。这确实是有 价值的。 But how much? Statcast assigns everything a run value, in order to put disperate things such as catcher framing, blocking, outfield throwing arms, and first base receiving on the same scale. One OAA in this skill is given the same value as one OAA for a fielder collecting batted balls, so it’s worth 0.75 of a run. 但价值究竟有多少？Statcast 为每项动作赋予一个得分价值（run value），以便将捕手 偷好球（catcher framing）、挡球（blocking）、外野臂力（outfield throwing arms ）以及一垒接球等截然不同的项目放在同一尺度上进行比较。在这项技能中获得的 1 个 OAA，其价值与野手处理击出球获得的 1 个 OAA 相同，因此相当於 0.75 分（0.75 of a run）。 For someone like Burleson, that matters a lot. Take the minus-2 Fielding Runs he’s at for collecting batted balls, add the +5 Fielding Runs he’s going to add here for receiving, include some previously accounted for value for getting double plays turned, and it definitely changes the perception of how you view him defensively. He goes from below-average (-2 Fielding Run) to above (+3). 对於像 Alec Burleson 这样的球员来说，这非常重要。拿他在处理击出球时获得的 -2 防守得分（Fielding Runs），加上他在此处因接传球而增加的 +5 防守得分（Fielding Runs），再算上先前计算的完成双杀的价值，这绝对会改变你对他防守表现的看法。他从 低於平均水准（-2 防守得分）跃升至高於平均水准（+3 防守得分）。 https://img.mlbstatic.com/mlb-images/image/upload/t_16x9/t_w1536/mlb/aexvwomrihj0wlf6kpdc.jpg But in another sense, it’s just never going to match up to things that happen so much more often. The most valuable receiving year we have over the last six seasons was Olson in 2021, who earned +7 runs just from receiving. That’s a lot of value for an infrequent thing – and yet it pales in comparison to the value added by this year’s best hitters (Yordan Alvarez, +48 batting runs), pitchers (Jacob Misiorowski, +42), or defenders overall (Pete Crow-Armstrong, +24). 但从另一个角度来看，它永远无法与那些发生得频繁得多的事情相提并论。在过去六个赛 季中，接球价值最高的一年是 2021 年的 Matt Olson，他仅凭接传球就贡献了 +7 分。 对於一件不常发生的事情来说，这是一笔巨大的价值──但与今年最优秀的打者（ Yordan Alvarez，+48 打击得分）、投手（Jacob Misiorowski，+42 得分）或整体防守 者（Pete Crow-Armstrong，+24 得分）所创造的价值相比，就显得相形见绌了。 Which, we think, is exactly what was expected at the start. It matters a little. Little things add up to a lot. It’s just hard to stand out without the chances to do so. Now, at least, we’ll know a little more about who excels at this generally underappreciated skill. 我们认为，这正是最初所预期的结果。它确实有一点影响。小事累积起来就是大事。只是 在缺乏机会的情况下很难脱颖而出。现在，至少我们对谁在这项通常被忽视的技能上表现 出色有了更多的了解。 It’s not a huge thing. It’s not nothing, either. All the little things in baseball add up to victory. This one does, too. 这不是一件天大的大事，但也绝非无足轻重。棒球中的所有细节累积起来就能换来胜利。 这项技能也是如此。 --Mike Petriello is a stats analyst for MLB.com, focusing on Statcast and Baseball Savant, and is also a contributor to MLB Network. --Mike Petriello 是 MLB.com 的数据分析师，专注於 Statcast 和 Baseball Savant，同时也是 MLB Network 的撰稿人。 -- 有趣的数据，那个3D图真的好厉害。 First Base Receiving Leaderboard https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/leaderboard/first-base-scoops-receiving 原文中"going back to 2021"连结: https://shorturl.at/vP2Ct 在欲观察的选手後 3D 选项的 Load Visual → Go to Visual。 电脑版：滚轮缩放，可以针对每个点看到每个play。 左键按压後拖曳可以改变视角，拉至上方俯瞰等。会看到一面球墙。 手机版：操作雷同，直接以手指手势直觉操作。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 49.217.113.140 (台湾) ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/Baseball/M.1787188125.A.61B.html ※ 编辑: Yjizz (49.217.113.140 台湾), 08/20/2026 13:57:44